Abstract:Objective To explore the clinical effect of multidisciplinary teamwork in the application of enhanced recevery after surgery in the treatment of hip fractures in elderly patients.Methods 100 patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture treated in Datong Fifth People's Hospital from August 2019 to December 2020 were randomly divided into control group (50 cases)and study group (50 cases).There were 21 males and 29 females in the control group.The average age was (73.0±10.7)years (range,70~87 years).27 left fracture and 23 right fracture were included.There were 30 cases of stable type EvansⅠ,15 cases of unstable type EvansⅠand 5 cases of type EvansⅡ.There were 19 males and 31 females in ERAS group.The average age was (75.0±11.2)years (range,70~89 years).There were 21 cases on the left and 29 cases on the right.There were 33 cases of stable type EvansⅠ,13 cases of unstable type EvansⅠ,and 4 cases of type EvansⅡ.Multidisciplinary teamwork ERAS treatment process and traditional conventional treatment process were used respectively.The preoperative waiting time,average hospital stay,hospitalization cost and visual analogue scale(VAS),inpatient satisfaction score,incidence of complications and the hip Harris scores.Results The preoperative hospital stay,average hospital stay,hospitalization expenses and the incidence of postoperative complications in ERAS group were lower than those in the control group.The satisfaction score and the hip Harris scores of postoperative in ERAS group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.001).The VAS score of pain in ERAS group was significantly lower than that in control group on the first day after operation (P<0.05),but there was no significant difference between the two groups before operation and on the fifth day(P>0.05).Conclusion The application of multi-disciplinary teamwork assisted enhanced recovery after surgery in the treatment of hip fractures in elderly patients can significantly improve the medical quality and satisfaction of patients,reduce the occurrence of complications and reduce the treatment cost.
于红伟,张晋华,林涛,庞哲. 多学科团队合作应用加速康复外科技术治疗老年患者髋部骨折[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2022, 28(8): 702-705.
Yu Hongwei,Zhang Jinhua,Lin Tao,Pang Zhe. pplication of Multidisciplinary Teamwork Combined with Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in the Treatment of Hip Fractures in Elderly Patients. sygkzz, 2022, 28(8): 702-705.
[1]张英泽.临床创伤骨科流行病学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:150-170.
[2]Willson T,Nelson SD,Newbold J,et al.The clinical epidemiology of male osteoporosis:A review of the recent literature[J]Clin Epidemiol,2015,9(7):65-76.
[3]张宇明,郝永状,高刚.股骨粗隆间骨折内固定系统研究进展[J].实用骨科杂志,2014,20(3):243-246.
[4]Ljungqvist O,Scott M,Fearon KC.Enhanced recovery after surgery:A review[J].JAMA Surg,2007,152(3):292-298.
[5]Mutlu H,Bilgili F,Mutlu S,et al.The effects of preoperative noninvasive cardiac tests on delay to surgery and subsequent mortality in elderly patients with hip fracture[J].J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil,2016,29(1):49-54.
[6]赵琴,张玲.骨科主导多学科协作模式下加速康复外科在老年髋部骨折患者围手术期中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2021,29(12):18-21.
[7]Simunovic N,Devereaux PJ,Sprague S,et al.Effect of earil surgery after hip fracture on mortality and complications:systematic review and metaanalysis[J].CMAJ,2010,182(15):1609-1616.
[8]张长青,张伟.我国老年髋部骨折绿色通道建设的现实意义[J].中华创伤杂志,2014,30(3):196-198.
[9]杨明辉,李文菁,孙伟桐,等.我国老年髋部骨折围手术期治疗现状调查[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2018,20(7):566-571.
[10]周宗科,翁习生,曲铁兵,等.中国髋、膝关节置换术加速康复围手术期管理策略的专家共识[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2016,9(1):1-9.
[11]Kehlet H.Enhanced postoperative recovery:Good from afar,but from good?[J].Anaesthesia,2020,75(Suppl 1):e54-e61.
[12]张理,姜涛,席小燕.系统疼痛管理对老年髋部骨折手术患者应激反应及疼痛阈值的影响[J].创伤外科杂志,2019,52(5):299-303.
[13]孙志坚,孙旭,孙伟桐,等.我国创伤骨科医生围手术期饮食管理现状调查[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2018,20(8):683-688.
[14]Ljungqvist O,Soreide E.Preoperative fasting[J].Br J Surg,2003,90(4):400-406.
[15]田伟,吴新宝,余斌,等.骨科手术围手术期禁食禁饮管理指南[J]中华创伤骨科杂志,2019,21(10):829-833.
[16]Yang R,Tao W,Chen YY,et al.Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional perioperative care in laparoscopic hepatectomy:A meta-analysis[J].Int J Surg,2016(Pt A):274-282.
[17]Wong-Lun-Hing EM,van Woerden V,Lodewick TM,et al.Abandoning prophylactic abdominal drainage after hepatic surgery:10 years of no-drain policy in an enhanced recovery after surgery environment[J].Dig Surg,2017,34(5):411-420.