Abstract:Objective To explore the surgical site infection rate and the risk factors by analysis data from targeted monitoring of surgical site infecitons after total knee arthroplasty in Beijing from 2012 to 2017.Methods The data contains information on patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty in 80 hospitals of secondary and tertiary hospitals in Beijing hospital infection monitoring management system.A total of 11 148 cases of total knee arthroplasty patients were monitored,including 2 225 males,8 923 females,1 667 patients aged>75 years and 9 481 patients aged≤75 years.SPSS 20.0 software was used to describe and analyze the infection of the surgical site by Logistic regression.Results 28 cases (0.25%) developed surgical site infection.Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that long operation duration,drainage and low level of operation hospital were the risk factors of surgical site infection in total knee arthroplasty.The risk of surgical site infection was higher in patients with operation time more than 90minutes than in patients with operation time less than 90minutes (OR=4.509,95%CI:1.349~15.070).The risk of surgical site infection was lower (OR=0.214,95%CI:0.099~0.461) in tertiary hospitals than in secondary hospitals.Drainage could increase the risk of surgical site infection (OR=6.619,95%CI:1.948~22.487).Conclusion The targeted monitoring method of surgical site infection of total knee arthroplasty in the Beijing Hospital infection monitoring management system can be used as a reference for other institutions to carry out monitoring work.The occurrence of surgical site infection is affected by many factors,so comprehensive prevention and control measures should be taken to reduce the risk of infection and ensure the safety of patients.
任燕 1,刘爽 1,杨琳 1,武迎宏 2,陈辉 1*. 北京市全膝关节置换术手术部位感染监测的多中心研究[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2022, 28(3): 215-219.
Ren Yan 1,Liu Shuang 1,Yang Lin 1,Wu Yinghong 2,Chen Hui 1. A Multicenter Study on Surveillance of Surgical Site Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Beijing. sygkzz, 2022, 28(3): 215-219.
[1]Clohisy JC,Calvert G,Tull F,et al.Reasons for revision hip surgery:aretrospective review[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2004(429):188-192.
[2]Bozic KJ,Kamath AF,Ong K,et a1.Comparative epidemiology of revision arthroplasty:Failed THAposes greater clinical and economic burdens than failedTKA[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2015(473):2131-2138.
[3]Gottschalk MB,Johnson JP,Sadlack CK,et al.Decreased infection rates following total joint arthroplasty in a large county run teaching hospital:a single surgeon's experience and possible solution[J].J Arthroplasty,2014,29(8):1610-1616.
[4]Kapadia BH,McElroy MJ,Issa K,et al.The economic impact of periprosthetic infections following total knee arthroplasty at a specialized tertiary-care center[J].J Arthroplasty,2014,29(5):929-932.
[5]Szilágyi E,B r cz K,Gastmeier P,et al.The national nosocomial surveillance network in Hungary:results of two years of surgical site infection surveillance[J].J Hosp Infect,2009,71(1):74-80.
[6]周振宇.髋膝关节置换术后假体周围感染预防和治疗的相关研究[D].苏州大学,2016.
[7]Rosenthal VD,Richtmann R,Singh S,et al.Surgical site infections,International nosocomial infection control consortium report,Data summary of 30 countries,2005—2010[J].Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol,2013,34(6):597-604.
[8]Edwards JR,Peterson KD,Mu Y,et al.National healthcare safety network (NHSN) report:data summary for 2006 through 2008,issued December 2009[J].Am J Infect Control,2009,37(10):783-805.
[9]Grammatico-Guillon L,Rusch E,Astagneau P.Surveillance ofprosthetic joint infections:international overview and new insights for hospital databases[J].J Hosp Infect,2015,89(2):90-98.
[10]Dicks KV,Lewis SS,Durkin MJ,et al.Surveying thesurveillance:surgical site infections excludedby the January 2013 updated surveillancedefinitions[J].Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol,2014,35(5):570-573.
[11]Mannien J,Wille JC,Snoeren RL,et al.Impact of postdischarge surveillance on surgical site infection rates for several surgical procedures:results from the nosocomial surveillance network in The Netherlands[J].Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol,2006,27(8):809-816.
[12]Ju MH,Ko CY,Hall BL,et al.A comparison of 2 surgicalsite infection monitoring systems[J].JAMA Surg,2015,150(1):51-57.
[13]World Health Organization.Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection[M].2nd ed.Geneva,2018:1-184.
[14]Cheng H,Chen BP,Soleas IM,et al.Prolonged operative duration increasesrisk of surgical site infections:A systematic review[J].Surg Infect (Larchmt),2017,18(6):722-735.
[15]蔡金池,王文己,张通.腰椎手术后路切口并发症现状及研究进展[J].实用骨科杂志,2021,27(9):815-820.
[16]帖小佳,赵梦,韩亚军,等.中国大陆居民髋膝关节置换后假体周围感染危险因素的Meta分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2017,21(35):5727-5732.
[17]吴华,刘民,杨雪松,等.腰椎管狭窄症术后手术部位感染危险因素分析[J].首都医药,2012,(24):12-15.
[18]秦磊磊,杨建业,李飞龙,等.关节置换术后假体周围感染患者相关危险因素研究进展[J].中华创伤杂志,2019,35 (2):184-189.
[19]Petherick ES,Dalton JE,Moore PJ,et al.Methods for identifying surgical woundinfection after discharge from hospital:a systematic review[J].BMC Infect Dis,2006(6):170.