Effect of Different Treatment Methods on Function of Posterior Segment of Foot in Patients with Acute Lateral Collateral Ligament Injury of the Ankle Joint
Department of 1st Orthopedics,Ningde Hospital,Fujian Medical University
Abstract:Objective To discuss the effect of different treatment methods on function of posterior segment of foot in patients with acute lateral collateral ligament injury of the ankle joint.Methods 131 cases of patients with acute lateral collateral ligament injury of the ankle joint were analyzed retrospectively.According to different treatment methods,the patients were divided into conservative treatment group (plaster fixation),direct surgical repair group (anchor nail repair) and surgical ligament reconstruction group (modified Elmslie operation mode).The AOFAS score was used to evaluate the function of posterior segments of foot,and the scores of AOFAS before treatment and 12 months after treatment,clinical therapeutic effect and complications were compared among the three groups.Results The total AOFAS scores after 12 months of treatment in the three groups were significantly increased compared with those before treatment (P<0.05),among which the total AOFAS score and clinical therapeutic effect in the direct surgical repair group and surgical ligament reconstruction group were significantly better than those in the conservative treatment group (P<0.05),but the incidence rates of complications in the two groups were higher than that in the conservative treatment group,and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).The differences in the total AOFAS scores,clinical therapeutic effect and incidence rates of complications between the direct surgical repair group and surgical ligament reconstruction group were not statistically significant (P>0.05).Conclusion The improvement effect of operation method on the function of posterior segment of foot in patients with acute lateral collateral ligament injury of the ankle joint is more obviously than conservative treatment,but the safety is poor.And the effect of anchor nail repair is similar to the modified Elmslie operation,so the treatment plan should be determined based on the comprehensive situation.
陈挺霖. 不同方法治疗急性踝关节外侧副韧带损伤的疗效比较[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2017, 23(1): 21-24.
Chen Tinglin. Effect of Different Treatment Methods on Function of Posterior Segment of Foot in Patients with Acute Lateral Collateral Ligament Injury of the Ankle Joint. sygkzz, 2017, 23(1): 21-24.
[1]焦晨,胡跃林,郭秦炜,等.不同方法修复踝关节外侧副韧带慢性损伤的稳定性评价[J].中国组织工程研究,2013,17(13):2358-2367.
[2]张如云,张奇,杨宗酉,等.成人踝关节损伤的流行病学分析[J].中国骨科临床与基础研究杂志,2014(3):139-143.
[3]Hamido F,Ibrahim SA,Abo-ei-Noor T,et al.Evaluation of the results of Watson jones tenodesis in chronic lateral instability of the ankle[J].Foot and Ankle Surgery,2007,13(2):56-62.
[4]Cortereal NM,Moreira RM.Arthroscopic repair of chronic lateral ankle instability[J].Foot and Ankle International,2009,30(3):213-217.
[5]吴显奎,孙永建,金丹.急性踝关节外侧副韧带损伤手术与非手术治疗的Meta分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2012,14(6):500-506.
[6]MS Pinzur,NN Shields,B Goelitz,et al.American orthopaedic foot and ankle society shoe survey of diabetic patients.[J].Foot & Ankle International,1999,20(11):703-707.
[7]菲茨杰拉德.骨科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:127-129.
[8]Mccollum GA,Bekerom MPJVD,Kerkhoffs GMMJ,et al.Syndesmosis and deltoid ligament injuries in the athlete[J].Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy,2013,21(6):1328-1337.
[9]周一飞,卢晓郎,赖红燕,等.Evans和Chrisman-Snook术式治疗踝关节外侧副韧带Ⅱ度损伤的生物力学比较[J].中国骨伤,2012,28(8):654-657.
[10]陈前博.踝关节外侧副韧带解剖学测量及手术重建疗效分析[D].第三军医大学,2009.
[11]李红,刘胜才,唐迎春,等.自制定位装置在关节镜下手术治疗前交叉韧带止点撕脱骨折中的应用[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2016,31(4):422-423.
[12]Park HJ,Cha SD,Kim SS,et al.Accuracy of MRI findings in chronic lateral ankle ligament injury:comparison with surgical findings[J].Clin Radiol,2012,67(67):313-318.
[13]张本武,张军.手术与非手术治疗急性踝关节外侧副韧带损伤比较[J].现代仪器与医疗,2016,22(3):118-122.
[14]吴显奎.急性踝关节外侧副韧带损伤手术与非手术治疗的系统评价[D].广州:南方医科大学,2012.