两种锁定钢板治疗Rüedi Ⅲ型Pilon骨折的疗效比较

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (2080 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的比较万向锁定加压接骨板(variable angle locking compression plate，VA-LCP)与普通锁定加压接骨板(locking compression plate，LCP)治疗Rüedi Ⅲ型Pilon骨折的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2018年1月至2020年12月丹阳市人民医院骨科收治的48例Rüedi Ⅲ型Pilon骨折患者资料。其中17例采用VA-LCP内固定(研究组)，男11例，女6例；年龄31~62岁，平均(46.3±6.7)岁。31例采用传统LCP内固定(对照组)，男22例，女9例；年龄36~67岁，平均(48.7±7.6)岁。采集并比较两组患者的术前住院天数、手术时间、术后住院天数、切口愈合、骨折愈合、并发症、术后Burwell-Charnley骨折复位放射学评价和美国足踝外科协会(American orthopaedic foot and ankle society，AOFAS)踝与后足评分。结果患者均获随访，随访时间12~18个月，平均(15.2±4.4)个月。两组间年龄、性别、骨折侧别等一般资料以及手术时间、切口愈合、放射学评价、骨折愈合差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。末次随访踝关节AOFAS评分，研究组70~95分，平均(85.4±11.3)分，其中优11例，良4例，可2例，优良率为88.2%；踝关节跖屈36 °~51 °，平均(40.3±7.5)°，背伸16 °~25 °，平均(20.7±3.6)°。对照组56~94分，平均(81.2±14.6)分，其中优18例，良8例，可5例，优良率为83.9%；踝关节跖屈32 °~50 °，平均(37.4±8.5)°，背伸13 °~22 °，平均(18.1±3.6)°。两组术后踝关节功能恢复满意，差异无统计学意义。研究组切口乙级愈合1例；对照组切口感染1例，乙级愈合5例，神经激惹1例，肌腱激惹4例。研究组软组织并发症情况优于对照组，差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论 VA-LCP与LCP两种钢板在固定Rüedi Ⅲ型Pilon骨折时，均能取得较好的临床疗效，具体选择视骨折情况而定。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	胡东
	束伟平
	陈志军
	贡碧洲
	周立建

关键词 ： Pilon骨折, 锁定加压接骨板, 并发症

Abstract：Objective To compare the clinical effect of variable angle locking compression plate (VA-LCP) and a common locking compression plate (LCP) in the treatment of Rüedi Ⅲ Pilon fractures.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted of the clinical data of 48 patients with Rüedi-Ⅲ Pilon fractures treated at the People's Hospital of Danyang from January 2018 to December 2020.Of these，17 patients received VA-LCP-based internal fixation (study group)，consisting of 11 males and 6 females，aged between 31 and 62 years old，with a mean age of (46.3±6.7)years old.Additionally，31 patients underwent traditional LCP-based internal fixation (control group)，including 22 males and 9 females，aged from 36 to 67 years old，with a mean age of (48.7±7.6)years old.Data on operation time，hospital stay，incision healing，fracture healing，and complications were collected during follow-up.Postoperative X-rays were used to determine the Burwell-Charnley radiological score，and the American orthopaedic foot and ankle society(AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score was employed to assess ankle joint function at the final follow-up.Results All patients were followed up for 12 to 18 months，with an average follow-up time of (15.2±4.4)months.There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age，gender，fracture side，preoperative waiting time，operation time，and fracture healing time，as well as postoperative radiological evaluation of Burwell-Charnley fracture reduction (P＞0.05).In the study group，the AOFAS score at the last follow-up ranged from 70 to 95，average (85.4±11.3)，with 11 excellent cases，4 good cases，2 fair cases，resulting in an excellent and good rate of 88.2%.Ankle plantar flexion was 36 ° to 51 °，average (40.3±7.5)°，and dorsiflexion was 16 ° to 25 °，average (20.7±3.6)°.In the control group，the AOFAS score ranged from 56 to 94，average (81.2±14.6)，with 18 excellent cases，8 good cases，5 fair cases，resulting in an excellent and good rate of 83.9%.Ankle plantar flexion was 32 ° to 50 °，average (37.4±8.5)°，and dorsiflexionwas 13 ° to 22 °，average (18.1±3.6)°.There was no significant difference in ankle function between the two groups.The incidence of soft tissue complications in the study group was better than that in the control group，and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).In the study group，there was 1 case of grade B healing of the incision.In the control group，there were 1 case of incision infection，5 cases of grade B healing，1 case of nerve irritation，and 4 cases of tendon irritation.Conclusion Both VA-LCP and LCP can achieve good clinical efficacy in the fixation of Rüedi-Ⅲ pilon fractures，and be selected on the condition of the fracture.

Key words： pilon fracture locking compression plate complications

基金资助:江苏省卫生健康委员会老年健康科研项目(LKM2022083)

通讯作者: 周立建

作者简介: 胡东(1997－ )，男，研究生在读，南通大学医学院，1125533250@qq.com

引用本文:

胡东，束伟平，陈志军，贡碧洲，周立建. 两种锁定钢板治疗Rüedi Ⅲ型Pilon骨折的疗效比较[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2024, 30(4): 317-.
Hu Dong，Shu Weiping，Chen Zhijun，Gong Bizhou，Zhou Lijian. Comparison on the Clinical Efficacy of Two Locking Plates in the Treatment of Rüedi Ⅲ Pilon Fractures. sygkzz, 2024, 30(4): 317-.

链接本文:

http://www.sygkzz.com/CN/ 或 http://www.sygkzz.com/CN/Y2024/V30/I4/317

［1］Mandi DM，Belin RP，Banks J，et al.Pilon fractures［J］.Clin Podiatr Med Surg，2012，29(2)：243-278.
［2］Tang X，Liu L，Tu CQ，et al.Comparison of early and delayed open reduction and internal fixation for treating closed tibial Pilon fractures［J］.Foot Ankle Int，2014，35(7)：657-664.
［3］Minator SM，Ebrahimpour A，Okhovatpour MA，et al.The outcomes of Pilon fracture treatment：Primary open reduction and internal fixation versus two-stage approach［J］.Arch Bone Jt Surg，2018，6(5)：412-419.
［4］Gaulke R，Krettek C.Tibial pilon fractures：Advoidance and therapy of complications［J］.Unfallchirurg，2017，120(8)：658-666.
［5］Schweigkofler U，Benner S，Hoffmann R.Pilon Fractures［J］.Z Orthop Unfall，2015，153(3)：335-354；355-356.
［6］Bear J，Rollick N，Helfet D.Evolution in management of tibial Pilon fractures［J］.Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med，2018，11(4)：537-545.
［7］Kottmeier SA，Madison RD，Divaris N.Pilon fracture：Preventing complications［J］.J Am Acad Orthop Surg，2018，26(18)：640-651.
［8］Daniels NF，Lim JA，Thahir A，et al.Pilon fracture postoperative outcomes with definitive surgical management options：A systematic review and meta-analysis［J］.Arch Bone Jt Surg，2021，9(3)：272-282.
［9］Yeramosu T，Satpathy J，Perdue PW，et al.Risk factors for infection and subsequent adverse clinical results in the setting of operatively treated Pilon fractures［J］.Orthop Trauma，2022，36(8)：406-412.
［10］Oladeji LO，Platt B，Crist BD.Diabetic Pilon factures：Are they as bad as we think?［J］.Orthop Trauma，2021，35(3)：149-153.
［11］Bastias C，Lagos L.New principles in Pilon fracture management：Revisiting rüedi and allgwer concepts［J］.Foot Ankle Clin，2020，25(4)：505-521.
［12］Torino D，Mehta S.Fibular fixation in distal tibia fractures：Reduction aid or nonunion generator?［J］.Orthop Trauma，2016，30(4)：S22-25.
［13］Hong CC，Tan SHS，Saha S，et al.Fibula fixation in the treatment of tibial pilon fractures-Is it really necessary?［J］.Foot Ankle Surg，2022，28(7)：891-897.
［14］Kurylo JC，Datta N，Iskander KN，et al.Does the fibula need to be fixed in complex Pilon fractures?［J］.J Orthop Trauma，2015，29(9)：424-427.
［15］Liu J，Smith CD，White E，et al.A systematic review of the role of surgical approaches on the outcomes of the tibia pilon fracture［J］.Foot Ankle Spec，2016，9(2)：163-168.
［16］Queipo LA，Jimenez GC，De BD，et al.Complications after plating of articular pilon fractures：A comparison of anteromedial，anterolateral，and medial plating［J］.Acta Orthop Belgica，2021，86(S3)：102-113.
［17］王刚，王凤斌，章乐成，等.改良前外侧入路治疗Pilon骨折伴Weber C型腓骨骨折［J］.中国矫形外科杂志，2022，30(2)：7-100.
［18］周立建，陈志军，杨国涛，等.经腓骨后缘入路联合后前位中空螺钉治疗旋后外旋型踝关节骨折［J］.临床骨科杂志，2023，26(1)：127-131.
［19］Zelle BA，Dang KH，Ornell SS.High-energy tibial pilon fractures：An instructional review［J］.Int Orthop，2019，43(8)：1939-1950.
［20］Saad BN，Yingling JM，Liporace FA，et al.Pilon fractures：Challenges and solutions［J］.Orthop Res Rev，2019，24(11)：149-157.