两种手术方式治疗高龄肩袖损伤合并肱二头肌腱长头腱损伤疗效比较

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1851 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的系统评估肩袖修复合并肱二头肌腱长头腱固定或切断手术治疗高龄患者的早期随访疗效。方法回顾性分析2015年6月至2019年12月于我院行肩关节镜下肩袖修复合并二头肌长头腱手术的82例70岁以上患者的临床资料。长头腱固定手术的37例(37肩)纳入固定组，男15例，女22例；年龄71~87岁，平均(74.3±4.4)岁。长头腱切断手术的45例(45肩)纳入切断组，男18例，女27例；年龄70~88岁，平均(76.1±5.2)岁。统计并比较两组的手术时间，二头肌相关并发症(popeye畸形、二头肌痉挛、上臂前方疼痛等)，手术近期相关并发症(感染、伤口问题、骨折、神经血管损伤、死亡等)，术后12个月的美国肩肘外科医师学会(American shoulder and elbow surgeons，ASES)评分、上肢功能障碍评分量表(disability of arm，shoulder and hand，DASH)以及健康调查简表(the MOS 36-item short-form health survey，SF-36)评分。结果所有患者术后随访13~18个月。固定组手术时间(73.76±32.37)min，明显长于切断组(57.67±21.83)min，两组比较，差异有统计学意义(P＝0.021)。固定组二头肌相关并发症的发生率为5.4%(2/37)，手术近期相关并发症的发生率为13.4%(5/37)；切断组二头肌相关并发症的发生率为17.8%(8/45)，手术近期相关并发症的发生率为6.7%(3/45)。术后12个月固定组和切断组的ASES评分分别为(86.7±4.4)分、(83.9±11.1)分，DASH评分分别为(8.5±4.2)分、(9.7±1.9)分，两组比较，差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。术后12个月SF36评分组间比较，固定组在生理功能、生理职能、躯体疼痛和一般健康状况方面的得分明显高于切断组，差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05)；在活力、社会功能、情感职能及精神健康方面，两组评分未见明显差异。结论高龄患者缝合肩袖后固定和直接切断肱二头肌腱长头，1年后都可以取得优良的临床疗效；相比切断手术，固定手术后二头肌相关并发症概率更低，但是出现早期手术并发症概率增高，生活质量更高，自理能力更强。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ：肩袖修复, 肱二头肌长头腱, 并发症

Abstract：Objective To systematically evaluate the early effect of rotator cuff repair combined with tenotomy or tenodesis of long head of the biceps tendon in elderly patients.Methods The clinical data of 82 patients over 70 years old who underwent shoulder cuff repair combined with biceps longhead tendon surgery under arthroscopy were analyzed retrospectively from June 2015 to December 2019.37 cases (37 shoulders) were included in the fixation group，including 15 males and 22 females.The patients were 71~87 years old，with an average age of (74.3±4.4)years；45 cases (45 shoulders) who underwent long head tendon resection were included in the amputation group，including18 males and 27 females.The patientswere 70~88 yearsold，with an average age of (76.1±5.2)years.The operation time，biceps related complications (popeye deformity，biceps spasm，upper arm pain，etc.)，recent complications of operation (infection，wound problems，fracture，neurovascular injury，death，etc.)，the American shoulder and elbow surgeons(ASES) score 12 months after operation，Disability of arm，shoulder and hand(DASH) and the MOS 36-item short-form health survey(SF-36) were compared.Results All patients were followed up for 13~18 months.The operation time of the fixation group was (73.76±32.37) min，which was significantly longer than that of the amputation group (57.67±21.83) min (P＝0.021).The incidence of biceps related complications was 5.4% (2/37) and the recent complications of operation was 13.4%(5/37) in fixation group；the incidence of biceps related complications was 17.8%(8/45) and the recent complications of operation was 6.7%(3/45) in amputation group.Twelvemonths after operation，the ASES score and DASH score of fixation group and amputation group were (86.7±4.4)，(83.9±11.1) and (8.5±4.2)，(9.7±1.9) respectively，and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P＞0.05).The scores of physical function，physical function，physical pain and general health status in the fixed group were significantly higher than those in the amputated group (P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in vitality，social function，emotional function and mental health between the two groups.Conclusion Elderly patients with rotator cuff suture fixation and direct cut off the long head of biceps brachii tendon can achieve excellent clinical efficacy after one year；compared with the cut-off operation，the probability of biceps related complications after fixation operation is lower，but the probability of early surgical complications is higher，the quality of life is higher，and the selfcare ability is stronger.

Key words： rotator cuff repair long head of biceps complications

通讯作者: 王江

作者简介: 任晔(1983－ )，男，主治医师，华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院骨科，430030。

引用本文:

任晔，祁军，游洪波，郭风劲，王江 *. 两种手术方式治疗高龄肩袖损伤合并肱二头肌腱长头腱损伤疗效比较[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2021, 27(7): 577-582.
Ren Ye，Qi Jun，You Hongbo，et al. Comparison of Two Different Surgical Techniques in Treatment of Rotator Cuff Injury Combined with Long Head of the Biceps Tendon Lesions in Elderly Patients. sygkzz, 2021, 27(7): 577-582.

链接本文:

http://www.sygkzz.com/CN/ 或 http://www.sygkzz.com/CN/Y2021/V27/I7/577

［1］Sarmento M.Long head of biceps：from anatomy to treatment［J］.Acta Reumatol Port，2015，40(1)：26-33.
［2］Riley GP，Harrall RL，Constant CR，et al.Glycosaminoglycans of human rotator cuff tendons：changes with age and in chronic rotator cuff tendinitis［J］.Ann Rheum Dis，1994，53(6)：367-376.
［3］Pozzetti Daou J，Nagaya DY，Matsunaga FT，et al.Does biceps tenotomy or tenodesis have better results after surgery?A systematic review and Meta-analysis［J］.Clin Orthop Relat Res，2021(479)：1561-1573.
［4］Verma N.In adults with lesions of the long head of the biceps tendon，tenodesis and tenotomy did not differ for pain and function at 2 years［J］.J Bone Joint Surg (Am)，2021，103(4)：357.
［5］Zhou P，Liu J，Deng X，et al.Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis for lesions of the long head of the biceps tendon：A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials［J］.Medicine (Baltimore)，2021，100(3)：e23993.
［6］Aflatooni JO，Meeks BD，Froehle AW，et al.Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis：patientreported outcomes and satisfaction［J］.J Orthop Surg Res，2020，15(1)：56.
［7］Meeks BD，Meeks NM，Froehle AW，et al.Patient satisfaction after biceps tenotomy［J］.Orthop J Sports Med，2017，5(5)：2325967117707737.
［8］Zhu XM，Leroux T，Ben-David E，et al.A meta-analysis of level I evidence comparing tenotomy vs tenodesis in the management of long head of biceps pathology［J］.J Shoulder Elbow Surg，2021，30(5)：961-968.
［9］唐步顺，曹学成，张抒.带线锚钉治疗肱二头肌长头腱断裂［J］.骨科，2012，3(1)：3.
［10］Tahal DS，Katthagen JC，Vap AR，et al.Subpectoral biceps tenodesis for tenosynovitis of the long head of the biceps in active patients younger than 45 years old［J］.Arthroscopy，2017，33(6)：1124-1130.
［11］Netuveli G，Wiggins RD，Hildon Z，et al.Quality of life at older ages：evidence from the English longitudinal study of aging (wave 1)［J］.J Epidemiol Community Health，2006，60(4)：357-363.
［12］李真真，汤哲，王荣.中国7个城市老年人失能现状调查［J］.中华流行病学杂志，2016，37(12)：1561-1564.
［13］Friedman JL，FitzPatrick JL，Rylander LS，et al.Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis in active patients younger than 55 years：Is there a difference in strength and outcomes?［J］.Orthop J Sports Med，2015，3(2)：2325967115570848.
［14］Corpus KT，Garcia GH，Liu JN，et al.Long head of biceps tendon management：A survey of the american shoulder and elbow surgeons［J］.HSS J，2018，14(1)：34-40.
［15］Morse KW，Eno JJ，Altchek DW，et al.Injuries of the biceps and superior labral complex in overhead athletes［J］.Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med，2019，12(2)：72-79.
［16］Elser F，Braun S，Dewing CB，et al.Anatomy，function，injuries，and treatment of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon［J］.Arthroscopy，2011，27(4)：581-592.
［17］Guttmann D.Editorial commentary：You may not have seen it，but it has seen you：Diagnosis of long head biceps tendon and subscapularis pathology in association with shoulder rotator cuff pathology can be challenging［J］.Arthroscopy，2017，33(11)：1977-1980.
［18］Ciccotti MG.Editorial Commentary：the long head of the biceps brachii tendonthe shoulder surgeon's conundrum［J］.Arthroscopy，2017，33(11)：1937-1939.
［19］DoostiIrani A，Nedjat S，Nedjat S，et al.Quality of life in Iranian elderly population using the SF-36 questionnaire：systematic review and metaanalysis［J］.East Mediterr Health J，2019，24(11)：1088-1097.
［20］Andersen WJ，Barcelos M，de Paiva Raffaelli M，et al.Ultrasound-Guided Suprapectoral Tenodesis of the Long Head of the Biceps Brachii［J］.Arthrosc Tech，2020，9(12)：e2071-e2076.
［21］Angelo RL.Surgical management of proximal long head biceps tendon disorders［J］.Sports Med Arthrosc Rev，2018，26(4)：176-180.