Abstract:Objective To evaluate dysfunction of induced membrane technique for restoration of long bone segmental defect for differentreasons.Methods A retrospective case series analysis was made from January 2012 to March 2019.Fifty-two patients (43 males,9 females)met the inclusion criteriawith a mean age of (36.7±4.5)years (range,15~73 years) admitted in General Hospital of Northern Theater Command.According to intial injury,there were 28 cases of traffic accident,4 cases of bruise injury caused by heavy object,11 cases of fall,2 cases of falling accident from high place,3 cases of military training injury,3 cases of bone tumor,and 1 case of osteomyelitis.According to the lesion sites,there were 22 cases of femur,28 cases of tibia and 2 cases of fibula.Masquelet technique was performed including phase Ⅰsurgical debridement,microbiology cultures and antibiotics-loaded bone cement impregnation to induce a membrane.Bone defect reconstruction was done by intramembranous bone grafting At phase Ⅱ,6~ 8 weeks after phase Ⅰ.Paley bone union evaluation system andX-ray films were observed during follow-up periods.Results All patients were followed up for (41.9±6.7) months (range,12~ 92 months).There were 47 cases obtained one-stage bone healing.31 cases were excellent,9 cases were good,7 cases were fair and 5 cases were poor according to Paley bone union evaluation system.The total effective rate was 76.9 percent.One case of osteomyelitis recurred after internal fixation removal,still under treatment.One case required debridement due to superficial infection.One case required to be treated by induced membrane technique again due to recurrence.Two cases poor existed as bone remodeling in bone graft area.Two cases underwent amputation because of recurrence.Two cases recurred because of deep infection,they could not return to normal activities and needed walking aids.The knee joint was slightly painful in three patients after exercise.One patient presented with mild squatting pain,seven patients presented with 0°~ 45° degree of motion of the knee joint,three patients presented with 0°~ 90° degree of motion of the knee joint.One underwent ankle fusion,and two patients presented with mild ankle flexion and extension limitation.Conclusion Masquelet induced membrane technique could promote fracture healing,restore limb function and reduce complications.Delayed treatment of diaphyseal bone defect and long fixation time of epiphyseal bone defect are the main reasons for limited joint movement.
纪振钢,周大鹏 *,韩天宇,赵勇,刘兵,薛海鹏,解冰,张昊,宋夏楠. Masquelet技术治疗下肢长骨骨缺损的肢体功能障碍分析[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2020, 26(7): 600-604.
Ji Zhengang,Zhou Dapeng *,Han Tianyu,et al. Dysfunction Analysis of Masquelet Technique for the Treatment of Long Bone Segmental Defects of Lower Limb. sygkzz, 2020, 26(7): 600-604.
[1]Masquelet AC,Fitoussi F,Begue T,et al.Reconstruction of the long bones by the induced membrane and spongy autograft[J].Ann Chir Plast Esthet,2000,45(3):346-353.
[2]Masquelet AC,Begue T.The concept of induced membrane for reconstruction of long bone defects[J].Orthop Clin North Am,2010,41(1):27-37.
[3]Paley D,Maar DC.Ilizarov bone transport treatment for tibial defects[J].J Orthop Trauma,2000,14(2):76-85.
[4]Nauth A,McKee MD,Einhorn TA,et al.Managing bone defects[J].J Orthop Trauma,2011,25(8):462-466.
[5]蔡善保,孟祥晖.大段骨缺损治疗的研究进展[J].中华创伤杂志,2015,31(4):376-379.
[6]Molina CS,Stinner DJ,Obremskey WT.Treatment of traumatic segmental long-bone defects:a critical analysis review[J].JBJS Rev,2014,2(4):01084474-201404000-00003.
[7]Keating JF,Simpson AH,Robinson CM.The management of fractures with bone loss[J].J Bone Joint Surg(Br),2005,87(2):142-150.
[8]买吾拉尼江·加马力,艾合买提江·玉素甫.Masquelet技术治疗大段骨缺损的最新进展[J].实用骨科杂志,2020,26(2):136-139.
[9]戚晓阳,邱旭升,施鸿飞,等.大段骨缺损的治疗进展[J].实用骨科杂志,2017,23(8):715-719.
[10]Masquelet A,Kanakaris NK,Obert L,et al.Bone repair using the Masquelettechnique[J].J Bone Joint Surg(Am),2019,101(11):1024-1036.
[11]Wen G,Zhou R,Wang Y,et al.Management of post-traumatic long bone defects:A comparative study based on long-term results[J].Injury,2019,50(11):2070-2074.
[12]Taylor BC,Hancock J,Zitzke R,et al.Treatment of bone loss with the induced membrane technique:techniques and outcomes[J].J Orthop Trauma,2015,29(12):554-557.
[13]Walker M,Sharareh B,Mitchell SA.Masqueletreconstruction for posttraumatic segmental bone defects in the forearm[J].J Hand Surg Am,2019,44(4):342.
[14]Morris R,Hossain M,Evans A,et al.Induced membrane technique for treating tibial defects gives mixed results[J].Bone Joint J,2017,99B(5):680-685.
[15]Taylor BC,French BG,Fowler TT,et al.Induced membrane technique for reconstruction to manage bone loss[J].J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2012,20(3):142-150.
[16]Apard T,Bigorre N,Cronier P,et al.Two-stage reconstruction of post-traumatic segmental tibia bone loss with nailing[J].Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2010,96(5):549-553.
[17]Hatashita S,Kawakami R,Ejiri S,et al.Acute Masquelet technique for reconstructing bone defects of an open lower limb fracture[J].Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg,2020,46(1):228.
[18]Wang J,Yin Q,Gu S,et al.Induced membrane technique in the treatment of infectious bone defect:a clinical analysis[J].Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2019,105(3):535-539.
[19]Gouron R,Deroussen F,Plancq MC,et al.Bone defect reconstruction in children using the induced membrane technique:a series of 14 cases[J].Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2013,99(7):837-843.
[20]El-Alfy BS,Ali AM.Management of segmental skeletal defects by the induced membrane technique[J].Indian J Orthop,2015,49(6):643-648.