InterTAN和解剖型锁定加压钢板治疗股骨转子下长段粉碎性骨折的比较研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1233 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的探讨联合加压交锁髓内钉(TriGen InterTAN hip fracture nailing system，InterTAN)和解剖型锁定加压钢板(locking compression plate，LCP)在股骨转子下长段粉碎性骨折患者中的治疗效果及安全性分析。方法回顾性分析2016年3月至2017年2月，我院收治的59例股骨转子下长段粉碎性骨折患者的临床资料，根据患者手术内固定方式不同分为I组(InterTAN内固定治疗，27例)和L组(LCP内固定治疗，32例)，比较两组患者围手术期指标、术后愈合情况、髋膝关节功能恢复情况及并发症发生情况。结果 I组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度、引流液量均低于L组，术中透视次数多于L组(P＜0.05)。两组患者下床活动时间比较，差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)；I组患者骨折愈合时间短于L组(P＜0.05)。I组患者髋关节优良率高于L组，分别为96.00%和68.97%(P＜0.05)。I组和L组膝关节功能优良率分别为96.00%和89.66%，两组比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。I组和L组在内固定松动、深静脉血栓形成、膝关节僵硬、骨折愈合延迟、畸形愈合、股骨头坏死、切口感染发生率方面比较，差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。结论 InterTAN在股骨转子下长段粉碎性骨折治疗中，相对LCP可减少手术创伤，促进患者术后康复和愈合，提高髋关节功能。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	武京伟
	刘利民
	高志华
	胡怀建

关键词 ：股骨转子, 粉碎性骨折, 防旋型股骨近端髓内钉, 解剖型锁定加压钢板

Abstract：Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of anti-rotation proximal femoral nail(InterTAN) and anatomic locking compression plate(LCP) in the treatment of comminuted fractures in the long segment of the femur.Methods We selected and retrospectively analysed of clinical data of 59 patients with comminuted femoral fractures in our department from March 2016 to February 2017 in our hospital，according to different methods of internal fixation，patients were divided into group I(InterTAN internal fixation，27 cases) and group L(LCP internal fixation，32 cases).Peroperative indications，postoperative recovery，hip and knee joints functional recovery and complications were compared between the two groups.Results The operation time，intraoperative blood loss，incision length，and drainage volume in group I were all lower than those in group L.Times of intraoperative fluoroscopy was more than that in group L(P＜0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the time of getting out of bed between the two groups(P＞0.05).The fracture healing time in group I was shorter than that in group L(P＜0.05).The hips in the I group had a better rate than the L group ［96.00% vs.68.97%，P＜0.05］.There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of excellent knee function in the I and L groups ［96.00% vs.89.66%，P＞0.05］.There was no statistically significant difference in the rates of loose fixation，deep venous thrombosis，stiffness of the knee joint，delayed fracture healing，malunion，femoral head necrosis，and incision infection in the I and L groups(P＞0.05).Conclusion In the long segment fracture of the lower femur，InterTAN can reduce surgical trauma，promote postoperative recovery and healing，and improve hip function compared with LCP.

Key words： femoral rotor comminuted fracture anti-rotation proximal femoral nail anatomically locked compression plate

作者简介: 武京伟(1983－ )，男，主治医师，首都医科大学宣武医院骨科，100053。

引用本文:

武京伟，刘利民，高志华，胡怀建. InterTAN和解剖型锁定加压钢板治疗股骨转子下长段粉碎性骨折的比较研究[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2019, 25(8): 695-699.
Wu Jingwei，Liu Limin，Gao Zhihua，et al. Therapeutic Effect of Anti-rotation Proximal Femoral Intramedullary Nail and Anatomic Locking Compression Plate in Comminuted Fracture of Long Segment of Femur. sygkzz, 2019, 25(8): 695-699.

链接本文:

http://www.sygkzz.com/CN/ 或 http://www.sygkzz.com/CN/Y2019/V25/I8/695

［1］Alaee F，Virk MS，Tang H，et al.Evaluation of the effects of systemic treatment with a sclerostin neutralizing antibody on bone repair in a rat femoral defect model［J］.J Orthop Res，2014，32(2)：197-203.
［2］Bartonicek J，Rammelt S.History of femoral head fracture and coronal fracture of the femoral condyles［J］.Int Orthop，2015，39(6)：1245-1250.
［3］Thomas A，Russell，Timothy D，et al.The problem of fracture fixation augmentation and description of a novel technique and implant for femoral neck stabilization［J］.Tech Orthop，2015，30(1)：22-27.
［4］应霁翀，刘观燚，张勇，等.三种不同内固定方式治疗股骨转子间骨折术后隐性失血及血栓形成的比较［J］.中华创伤骨科杂志，2016，18(5)：442-446.
［5］Kammerlander C，Doshi H，Gebhard F，et al.Long-term results of the augmented PFNA：A prospective multicenter trial［J］.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg，2014，134(3)：343-349.
［6］彭福强，邱志杰，曾卫平，等.动力髋螺钉与股骨近端髓内钉治疗老年股骨近端骨折临床疗效Harris评分及预后生活质量的影响［J］.河北医学，2016，22(11)：1777-1779.
［7］〖CM(22〗郭杰坤，章莹.两种内固定方式在股骨转子下长段粉〖CM)〗碎性骨折治疗中的应用［J］.中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版)，2013，8(1)：31-34.
［8］Sawaguchi T，Sakagoshi D，Shima Y，et al.Do design adaptations of a trochanteric nail make sense for Asian patients? Results of a multicenter study of the PFNAⅡ in Japan［J］.Injury，2014，45(10)：1624-1631.
［9］刘雅克，周振宇，陶然，等.锁定加压钢板内固定治疗人工髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折［J］.中华骨科杂志，2017，37(15)：897-905.
［10］周江军，肖春林，赵敏，等.新型组合式锁定加压钢板生物力学性能的三维有限元分析［J］.中华生物医学工程杂志，2016，20(1)：1-6.
［11］Tran TN，Warwas S，Haversath M，et al.Experimental and computational studies on the femoral fracture risk for advanced core decompression［J］.Clin Biomech(Bristol，Avon)，2014，29(4)：412-417.
［12］王军胜，周晓清，陈兴礼，等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉联合利塞膦酸钠治疗老年人股骨转子间骨折疗效观察［J］.中华老年医学杂志，2015，34(2)：171-174.
［13］Basso T，Klaksvik J，Foss OA，et al.The effect of interlocking parallel screws in subcapital femoral-neck fracture fixation：A cadaver study［J］.Clin Biomech(Bristol，Avon)，2014，29(2)：213-217.
［14］卢晓栋，王奔，徐炜，等.股骨距替代髋关节置换与髓内钉治疗高龄股骨转子间骨折疗效分析［J］.中华医学杂志，2016，96(31)：2466-2471.
［15］谢海明，陈胜，周炳荣，等.亚洲型与传统股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗股骨转子间骨折的比较［J］.中华医学杂志，2015，95(29)：2346-2350.
［16］潘华，刘瀚忠，许冠伟，等.加长型股骨近端防旋髓内钉与Gamma钉治疗股骨近端骨折伴股骨干骨折的疗效比较［J］.中华创伤杂志，2017，33(4)：338-343.
［17］王海洲，刘军，何倩伟，等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉与亚洲型股骨近端防旋髓内钉固定治疗股骨转子间骨折的疗效比较［J］.中华创伤骨科杂志，2016，18(5)：435-438.
［18］Hélin M，Pelissier A，Boyer P，et al.Does the PFNA^TM nail limit impaction in unstable intertrochanteric femoral fracture? A 115 case-control series［J］.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res，2015，101(1)：45-49.
［19］Gebauer M，Stark O，Vettorazzi E，et al.DXA and pQCT predict pertrochanteric and not femoral neck fracture load in a human side-impact fracture model［J］.J Orthop Res，2014，32(1)：31-38.
［20］刘秦松，丁尔勤，梁晶峰，等.股骨转子下骨折的手术治疗［J］.实用骨科杂志，2010，6(9)：695-697.
［21］张辉，陶巍栋，曹益民，等.微创锁定钢板内固定治疗股骨转子下骨折［J］.实用骨科杂志，2010，16(7)：548-552.