LARS韧带与自体腘绳肌腱重建前交叉韧带的中期疗效比较
1.西南医科大学附属医院骨与关节外科
2.邻水县人民医院骨科
Medium-term Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with LARS Artificial Ligament Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft
1.Department of Bone and Joint Surgery,Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University
2.Department of Orthopacdics,People's Hospital of Linshui
摘要 目的 比较韧带先进加强系统(ligament advanced reinforcement system,LARS)人工韧带与自体腘绳肌腱作为移植物重建前交叉韧带的中期临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析2014年1月至2017年1月行关节镜下LARS人工韧带或自体腘绳肌腱重建前交叉韧带患者的临床及随访资料,比较两组的临床疗效。LARS人工韧带组25例(人工韧带组),自体腘绳肌腱组35例(自体肌腱组)。术前与术后随访采用Lysholm、Tegner、国际膝关节评分委员会(international knee documentation committee,IKDC)评分评价临床疗效,采用前抽屉试验(ADT试验)、Lachman试验评价术后膝关节稳定性。结果 术后随访24~54个月,平均36个月。两组组内末次随访与术前比较,Lysholm、Tegner、IKDC评分升高,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);术前两组间Lysholm、Tegner、IKDC评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后末次随访人工韧带组与自体肌腱组在Lysholm评分、Tegner评分、IKDC评分、ADT试验及Lachman试验比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。人工韧带组术后重返运动时间(19.52±2.33)周,明显早于自体肌腱组(29.54±2.33)周,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 关节镜下LARS韧带与自体腘绳肌腱重建前交叉韧带中期疗效相当,均可恢复膝关节功能与稳定性,但使用LARS韧带重建的患者能够早期重返运动。
关键词 :
关节镜 ,
前交叉韧带 ,
LARS韧带 ,
自体腘绳肌腱 ,
重建
Abstract :Objective To assess the clinical outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with LARS artificial ligament versus hamstring tendon autografts.Methods We designed retrospective study patients that anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with LARS artificial ligament or hamstring tendon autografts to compare with the clinical outcome in the department between January 2014 and January 2017.Two groups of patients underwent surgeries with LARS artificial ligament (25 cases,Artificial ligament group) or hamstring tendon autograft (35 cases,Tendon autograft group).The Lysholm,Tegner score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score of patients before and last follow-up after operation were assessed.The objective knee stability was assessed by side to side difference of anterior drawer test and Lachman test.Results All the patients were followed up 24 to 54 months,with a mean of 36 months.The Lysholm,Tegner,IKDC score are improved in the two groups before surgery and in last follow-up.There were statistically significant difference(P<0.05).Before surgery there was no significant difference in the Lysholm,Tegner,IKDC score (P>0.05).Compared the Artificial ligament group with the Tendon autograft group at the latest follow up,the Lysholm score,Tegner sore,IKDC score,anterior drawer test and Lachman test were no statistical differences between the two groups (P>0.05).The time to return sport was (19.52±2.33) weeks in the Artificial ligament group,whereas (29.54±2.33) weeks in the Tendon autograft group,where existed a statistical difference between them (P<0.05).Conclusion Both the LARS artificial ligament and the hamstring tendon autograft are effective for ACL reconstruction to regain knee function and stability with similar mediumterm clinical consequences.However,the LARS artificial ligament takes an advantage of earlier return to sport over the hamstring tendon autograft.
Key words :
arthroscopic
anterior cruciate ligament
LARS artificial ligament
hamstring tendon autograft
reconstruction
基金资助: 四川省科技厅科研基金资助项目(2013JY0103)
通讯作者:
杨洪彬
作者简介 : 李宇(1991- ),男,研究生在读,西南医科大学附属医院骨与关节外科,646000。
引用本文:
李宇 1,张豪 2,王立志 1,郑秋 1,肖世卓 1,杨洪彬 1*. LARS韧带与自体腘绳肌腱重建前交叉韧带的中期疗效比较[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2019, 25(6): 509-513.
Li Yu 1,Zhang Hao 2,Wang Lizhi 1,et al. Medium-term Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with LARS Artificial Ligament Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft. sygkzz, 2019, 25(6): 509-513.
链接本文:
http://www.sygkzz.com/CN/ 或 http://www.sygkzz.com/CN/Y2019/V25/I6/509
[1]蔡道章.膝关节前交叉韧带损伤治疗的历史变革与发展[J].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2013,7(1):1-2.
[2]Paschos NK,Howell SM.Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:principles of treatment[J].EFORT Open Reviews,2016,1(11):398-408.
[3]Okoroha KR,Kadri O,Keller RA,et al.Return to play after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in national football league players[J].Orthop J Sports Med,2017,5(4) 232596711769878.
[4]Kay J,Memon M,Marx RG,et al.Over 90 % of children and adolescents return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:a systematic review and metaanalysis[J].Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2018,26(4):1019-1036.
[5]Tian S,Wang Y,Wang B,et al.Anatomic Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a hamstring tendon autograft and fresh-frozen allograft:A prospective,randomized,and controlled study[J].Arthroscopy,2016,32(12):2521-2531.
[6]Gupta R,Bahadur R,Malhotra A,et al.Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft with preserved insertions[J].Arthrosc Tech,2016,5(2):e269-e274.
[7]Lee JK,Lee S,Lee MC.Outcomes of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:Bone-quadriceps tendon graft versus double-bundle hamstring Tendon graft[J].Am J Sports Med,2016,44(9):2323-2329.
[8]刘玉新,李云,张其亮,等.4股腘绳肌腱与LARS人工韧带重建治疗急性ACL损伤早期疗效比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2017,32(6):634-636.
[9]刘华,狄正林,章军辉,等.关节镜下一期自体腘绳肌腱重建前交叉韧带联合LARS韧带重建后交叉韧带[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2014,29(12):1227-1229.
[10]Krupa S,Królikowska A,Reichert P.Postoperative knee joint stability following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the ligament advanced reinforcement system[J].Polim Med,2016,46(2):155-161.
[11]Bianchi N,Sacchetti F,Bottai V,et al.LARS versus hamstring tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:a single-centre,single surgeon retrospective study with 8 years of follow-up[J].Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol,2019,29(2):447-453.
[12]Chen T,Zhang P,Chen J,et al.Long-term outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using either synthetics with remnant preservation or hamstring autografts:A 10-year longitudinal study.[J].Am J Sports Med,2017,45(12):2739-2750.
[13]宋洋,蒋欢,杜庆钧,等.同种异体肌腱双束单隧道及单束单隧道重建膝关节前交叉韧带[J].中国组织工程研究,2017,21(34):5519-5525.
[14]李文凯,吴华,韦盛,等.关节镜下解剖位与过顶位前交叉韧带单束重建的近期疗效对比[J].骨科,2015,6(3):113-116.
[15]Webb JM,Salmon LJ,Leclerc E,et al.Posterior tibial slope and further anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed patient[J].Am J Sports Med,2013,41(12):2800-2804.
[16]Dejour D,Saffarini M,Demey G,et al.Tibial slope correction combined with second revision ACL produces good knee stability and prevents graft rupture[J].Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2015,23(10):2846-2852.
[17]张明宇,张亮,郑江,等.前交叉韧带重建术后运动员等速肌力训练的研究[J].实用骨科杂志,2016,22(12):1080-1082.
[18]Bartels T,Proeger S,Brehme K,et al.The SpeedCourt system in rehabilitation after reconstruction surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2016,136(7):957-966.
[19]Grindem H,Risberg MA,Eitzen I.Two factors that may underpin outstanding outcomes after ACL rehabilitation[J].Br J Sports Med,2015,49(22):1425.
[1]
臧建成 1,2,郭保逢 3,张永红 4,舒衡生 5,花奇凯 6,潘晓华 7,李刚 8,秦泗河 9*. Ilizarov技术培训的实践与思考——20期外固定与肢体重建培训班成功举办经验总结 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2021, 27(5): 474-477.
[2]
武洵,严清,孙俊,卫定禄,王维超. 单排锚钉结合“Chinese-way”技术治疗大型肩袖撕裂的临床疗效 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2021, 27(4): 359-362.
[3]
于延东,黄辉 *,杨林,闵楚惟,谭登辉,谷文光 *. 关节镜下双后内入路腘窝囊肿全切术的疗效分析 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2021, 27(4): 370-373.
[4]
杨化群 1,王财兴 2,李路 1*. 类风湿关节炎关节镜滑膜切除术后疾病活动的相关因素 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2021, 27(2): 175-178.
[5]
贺忱,高奉,钱驿,果森,思虹,周敬滨 *. 前交叉韧带重建术后残留轻度旋转不稳的风险因素分析 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2021, 27(1): 21-26.
[6]
王平,武春雷,许巍,张红,张弛. 关节镜下ACL重建并半月板修复后半月板不愈合的危险因素分析 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2020, 26(9): 782-786.
[7]
贺忱 1,赵志宏 2,高奉 1,钱驿 1,果森 1,思虹 1,周敬滨 1*. 前交叉韧带重建术后轻度旋转不稳定对临床疗效的影响 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2020, 26(9): 787-796.
[8]
陈敏,林佳俊,刘文革. 保留残端长度对自体腘绳肌腱单束重建前交叉韧带的效果影响 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2020, 26(8): 693-699.
[9]
胡鹏宇,余志平,刘端正,贾国庆,张海清,丛海波 *. 电磁导航系统辅助后交叉韧带重建胫骨隧道定位的效果评价 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2020, 26(8): 703-706.
[10]
李知玻,李凭跃,张涛,陈加荣,沈洪园,陈旭琼. 外侧支持带松解、内侧髌股韧带重建联合胫骨结节截骨术治疗严重复发性髌骨脱位 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2020, 26(7): 659-661.
[11]
邓晋京,黄敬 *,肖巍,王庆华,蒋笃东,党志雄. 应用Versoloc锚钉辅助肩关节镜治疗老年患者肱骨大结节骨折 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2020, 26(7): 634-637.
[12]
张海英 1,郑晨颖 2. 肩峰指数、关节盂倾斜度与肩关节镜手术后功能恢复的关系 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2020, 26(6): 487-503.
[13]
吴明凡,江淮,陈学周,孙良业. Larson术式重建膝关节后外侧结构的治疗体会 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2020, 26(6): 556-559.
[14]
傅捷,郝岩,周密,王晓宇,刘琳琳. 综合性措施预防关节镜下前交叉韧带重建术后感染 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2020, 26(6): 550-552.
[15]
林顺新,刘华,曹杰,王江波,龚冰南,赵枫. 关节镜辅助闭合复位技术治疗难复性DelbetⅡ型儿童股骨颈骨折 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2020, 26(6): 546-550.