椎间微分动力系统联合Tergumed对腰椎间盘突出症的疗效

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1574 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective〓To observe and compare the efficacy of intervertebral differential dynamics (IDD) combined with proxomed tergumed (Tergumed) and IDD combined exercise therapy in the treatment of patients with lumbar disc herniation.Methods〓64 lumbar disc herniation (LDH) patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria at the Fourth Medical Center of the General Hospital of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army from March 2022 to March 2023 were randomly divided into a experiment group and a control group using a random number table method.There were 32 cases in the experimental group，including 18 males and 14 females，aged from 26 to 60 years old，with an average age of (50.21±5.53) years old.There were 32 cases in the control group，including 19 males and 13 females，aged from 29 to 59 years old，with an average age of (50.65±6.12) years old.Both groups were given health education，and the control group was treated with IDD combined with exercise therapy once a day，5 times a week for 4 weeks.The experimental group was treated with IDD combined with Tergumed，and the IDD treatment was the same as the control group.The patients had Tergumed training three times a week for a total of 12 units for 4 weeks.The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the degree of lumbar pain，and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) was used to evaluate the change in the degree of dysfunction.Tergumed was used to evaluate lumbar biomechanical data-changes in lumbar flexion，dorsiflexion range of motion，and maximum muscle strength-in both groups.They were evaluated before treatment，at 4 weeks，and at 16 weeks.Results〓Before treatment，there were no significant differences in VAS score，ODI score，lumbar anterior flexion，dorsiflexion motion and maximum muscle strength between two groups (P＞0.05).After 4 weeks and 16 weeks of treatment，VAS，ODI and biomechanical data of 2 groups were better than before treatment，the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).After 16 weeks of treatment，there was no statistically significant difference in pain VAS score between the two groups (P＞0.05)，and the lower limit of 95% confidence interval 0.19(－0.07~1.03) was greater than the preset－1，meeting the non-inferiority test standard.After 4 weeks of treatment，there was no significant difference in the changes of ODI and biomechanical data between the two groups (P＞0.05).At 16 weeks，the changes in the maximum muscular strength values of flexion and extension in the experimental group were better than those in the control group before treatment (P＜0.05).Conclusion〓The clinical efficacy of IDD combined with Tergumed in the treatment of LDH patients is not inferior to that of IDD combined with conventional exercise therapy，which can significantly relieve pain，increase lumbar muscle strength and improve lumbar function under the premise of labor saving，and is safe and reliable，worthy of clinical promotion.

Key words： intervertebral differential dynamic system lumbar disc herniation spinal assessment training system non-inferiority

Corresponding Authors: Liu Kemin

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Fan Chen
	Shi Xiuxiu
	Fan Ru
	Hou Shuxun
	Li Xiao
	Liu Kemin

Cite this article:

Fan Chen,Shi Xiuxiu,Fan Ru, et al. Effect of Intervertebral Differential Dynamic System Combined with Tergumed on Lumbar Disc Herniation[J]. sygkzz, 2024, 30(3): 211-.

URL:

http://www.sygkzz.com/EN/ OR http://www.sygkzz.com/EN/Y2024/V30/I3/211

［1］Bernstein IA，Malik Q，Carville S，et al.Low back pain and sciatica：Summary of NICE guidance［J］.BMJ，2017(6)：6748.
［2］Benzakour T，Igoumenou V，Mavrogenis AF，et al.Current concepts for lumbar disc herniation［J］.Int Orthop，2019，43(4)：841-851
［3］Deyo RA，Mirza SK.Clinical Practice.Herniated lumbar intervertebral disk［J］.N Engl J Med，2016，374(18)：17631772.
［4］Kreiner DS，Hwang SW，Easa JE，et al.An evidencebased clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculoPathy［J］.SPine J，2014，14(1)：180191.
［5］周谋望，岳寿伟，何成奇，等.“腰椎间盘突出症的康复治疗”中国专家共识［J］.中国康复医学杂志，2017，32(2)：129-135.
［6］白跃宏，俞红.脊柱减压治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效及肌电图分析［J］.中华物理医学与康复杂志，2012，34(7)：536-538.
［7］Jiang K，Li Y，Cao GY，et al.Screening of genes related with intervertebral disc disease by dynamic differential interaction network analysis［J］.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci，2013，17(23)：3186-3191.
［8］怀娟，岳寿伟.腰椎间盘突出症康复治疗进展［J］.华西医学，2018，33(10)：5.
［9］Smuck M，Muaremi A，Zheng P，et al.Objective measurement of function following lumbar sPinal stenosis decompression reveals improved functional caPacity with stagnant real-life physical activity［J］.Spine J，2018，18(1)：15-21.
［10］张胜华，崔力扬，赵飞.Proxomed Tergumed系统康复训练在椎间孔镜术后康复的运用效果［J］.颈腰痛杂志，2021，42(5)：690-692.
［11］翟楠楠，戴琪萍，孙亚楠，等.电针夹脊穴结合 Tergumed 系统训练治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床观察［J］.上海中医药大学学报，2016，30(1)：36-39.
［12］孙亚男，翟楠楠，陈永强，等.电针结合Tergumed训练系统治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效观察［J］.上海针灸杂志，2016，35(6)：722-724.
［13］严广斌.视觉模拟评分法［J］.中华关节外科杂志：电子版，2014，8(2)：1.
［14］Davies CC，Nitz AJ.Psychometric properties of the roland-morris disability questionnaire compared to the Oswestry disability index：A systematic review［J］.Physical Therapy Reviews，2013，14(6)：399-408.
［15］中国康复医学会脊柱脊髓专业委员会基础研究与转化学组.腰椎间盘突出症诊治与康复管理指南［J］.中华外科杂志，2022，60(5)：8.
［16］马信龙.腰椎间盘突出症的病理学分型及其临床意义［J］.实用骨科杂志，2016，22(4)：384-384.
［17］中华医学会疼痛学分会脊柱源性疼痛学组.腰椎间盘突出症诊疗中国疼痛专家共识［J］.中国疼痛医学杂志 2020，26(1)：2-6.
［18］Demirel A，Yorubulut M，Ergun N，et al.Regression of lumbar disc herniation by physiotherapy.Does non-surgical spinal decompression therapy make a difference?Double-blind randomized controlled trial［J］.J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil，2017，30(5)：1015-1022.
［19］陆长春，肖海军，薛锋.PLDD联合腰背肌功能锻炼治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效观察及其对IL-6和TNF-α水平的影响［J］.解放军预防医学杂志，2019，37(4)：81-83.
［20］Wilczyński J，KasPrzak A.Dynamics of changes in isometric strength and muscle imbalance in the treatment of women with low back pain［J］.Biomed Res Int，2020(11)：1-8.