|
|
|
Abstract Objective〓To investigate the difference in short-term clinical efficacy between inactivation and replantation of tumor segments of periarticular osteosarcoma of the knee joint and total knee tumor prosthesis replacement in children.Methods〓 A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 26 patients with knee joint osteosarcoma treated in the Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors and Melanoma Department of Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated Tumor Hospital from January 2019 to January 2022.The cohort comprised 13 males and 13 females，ranging in age from 8 to 16 years，with a mean age of (11.88±2.42)years.Eight patients underwent tumor segment inactivation and replantation (5 femur，3 tibia)，forming the inactivation-replantation group，while 18 patients underwent total knee tumor prosthesis replacement surgery (9 femur，9 tibia)，constituting the prosthesis replacement group.Comparisons were made between the two groups in terms of general clinical data，functional assessment using the musculoskeletal tumor society(MSTS) score，knee joint range of motion(ROM) evaluation，regular postoperative X-ray examination，limb length discrepancy evaluation，oncologic assessment，and complication analysis.Results〓The follow-up period for the 26 patients with osteosarcoma around the knee joint ranged from 20 to 56 months，averaging (29.50±6.46)months.In the inactivation and replantation group，the limb length discrepancy ranged from 0.63 to 1.75 cm，averaging (1.03±0.37)cm，while in the prosthesis replacement group，the discrepancy ranged from 0.73 to 4.00 cm，averaging (1.96±0.88)cm.The comparison between the two groups revealed a statistically significant difference in limb length discrepancy (t＝2.86，P＝0.009).The average MSTS score for the inactivation and replantation group was (26.63±1.51)，whereas the prosthesis replacement group scored (24.50±1.89) points on average.This comparison also showed a statistically significant difference in MSTS scores (t＝2.81，P＝0.01).At the final follow-up，the average knee flexion angle in the inactivation and replantation group was (62.13±13.78)% of the healthy side，while the total knee tumor prosthesis replacement group exhibited an average knee flexion angle of (65.68±10.40)% of the healthy side.However，the comparison of knee flexion angles between the two groups did not reveal a statistically significant difference (χ2=1.25，P＝0.26).Conclusion〓In children，the inactivation and reimplantation of periarticular osteosarcoma tumor segments，aimed at preserving the epiphysis，can effectively maintain the growth and development potential of the affected limb.This approach also significantly enhances the joint function of the patient，demonstrating superior implant fusion，fewer complications，and overall，a better clinical outcome during short-term follow-up.
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Jiang Renbing
|
|
|
|
［1］于杨，郑凯，徐明，等.儿童骨肉瘤保肢手术方式选择的文献分析［J］.中国骨与关节杂志，2023，12(5)：361-368.
［2］Grimer RJ，Aydin BK，Wafa H，et al.Very long-term outcomes after endoprosthetic replacement for malignant tumours of bone［J］.Bone Joint J，2016，98-B(6)：857-864.
［3］Pala E，Trovarelli G，Angelini A，et al.Megaprosthesis of the knee in tumor and revision surgery［J］.Acta Biomed，2017，88(2S)：129-138.
［4］Ji T，Yang Y，Li DS，et al.Limb salvage using non-hinged endoprosthesis and staged correction of leg-length discrepancy for children with distal femoral malignant tumors［J］.Orthop Surg，2019，11(5)：819-825.
［5］Igarashi K，Yamamoto N，Shirai T，et al.The long-term outcome following the use of frozen autograft treated with liquid nitrogen in the management of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas［J］.Bone Joint J，2014，96-B(4)：555-561.
［6］Takeuchi A，Yamamoto N，Hayashi K，et al.Growth of epiphysis after epiphyseal-preservation surgery for childhood osteosarcoma around the knee joint［J］.BMC Musculoskelet Disord，2018，19(1)：185.
［7］El Masry AM，Azmy SI，Rahman Mustafa MA，et al.Does a single osteotomy technique for frozen autograft (Pedicled Freezing) in patients with malignant bone tumors of the long bones achieve union and local tumor control［J］.Clin Orthop Relat Res，2024，482(2)：340-349.
［8］Chen C，Garlich J，Vincent K，et al.Postoperative complications with cryotherapy in bone tumors［J］.J Bone Oncol，2017(7)：13-17.
［9］Takata M，Sugimoto N，Yamamoto N，et al.Activity of bone morphogenetic protein-7 after treatment at various temperatures：Freezing vs.pasteurization vs.allograft［J］.Cryobiology，2011，63(3)：235-239.
［10］Rogozhin DV，Bulycheva IV，Konovalov DM，et al.Classical osteosarcoma in children and adolescent［J］.Arkh Patol，2015，77(5)：68-74.
［11］Sadek WMS，Ebeid WA，Ghoneimy AE，et al.Functional and oncological outcome of patients with distal femoral osteosarcoma managed by limb salvage using modular endoprosthesis［J］.Ann Surg Oncol，2023，30(8)：5150-5158.
［12］Labott JR，Warne CN，Wyles CC，et al.Incidence of leg-length discrepancy after index hinge total knee arthroplasty［J］.J Arthroplasty，2021，36(5)：1607-1610.
［13］Van Egmond JC，Hesseling B，Verburg H，et al.Short-term functional outcome after fast-track primary total knee arthroplasty：Analysis of 623 patients［J］.Acta Orthop，2021，92(5)：602-607.
［14］Walker-Santiago R，Tegethoff JD，Ralston WM，et al.Revision total knee arthroplasty in young patients：Higher early reoperation and rerevision［J］.J Arthroplasty，2021，36(2)：653-656.
［15］Henderson ER，O'Connor MI，Ruggieri P，et al.Classification of failure of limb salvage after reconstructive surgery for bone tumours：A modified system Including biological and expandable reconstructions［J］.Bone Joint J，2014，96-B(11)：1436-1440.
［16］Capanna R，Scoccianti G，Frenos F，et al.What was the survival of megaprostheses in lower limb reconstructions after tumor resections［J］.Clin Orthop Relat Res，2015，473(3)：820-830.
［17］Kang S，Lee JS，Park J，et al.Staged lengthening and reconstruction for children with a leg-length discrepancy after excision of an osteosarcoma around the knee［J］.Bone Joint J，2017，99-B(3)：401-408.
［18］Kawaguchi N，Ahmed AR，Matsumoto S，et al.The concept of curative margin in surgery for bone and soft tissue sarcoma［J］.Clin Orthop Relat Res，2004 (419)：165-172.
［19］Wong KC，Sze LKY，Kumta SM.Complex joint-preserving bone tumor resection and reconstruction using computer navigation and 3D-printed patient-specific guides：A technical note of three cases［J］.J Orthop Translat，2021(29)：152-162.
［20］Shehadeh A，Al-Qawasmi M，Al Btoush O，et al.Tibia multiplanar deformities and growth disturbance following expandable endoprosthetic distal femur replacement［J］.J Clin Med，2022，11(22)：6734.
［21］Li Y，Yang Y，Huang Z，et al.Bone defect reconstruction with autologous bone inactivated with liquid nitrogen after resection of primary limb malignant tumors：An observational study［J］.Medicine (Baltimore)，2020，99(24)：E20442.
［22］Farooq MZ，Shafiq MB，Ali S，et al.Complications and outcome of bone sarcoma patients with limb salvage using liquid nitrogen-treated bone for reconstruction［J］.J Cancer Allied Spec，2024，10(1)：543.
［23］Leung ASM，Yeung MCF，Yau RCH，et al.Case report on metastatic pelvic bone tumor treated with frozen autograft by liquid nitrogen［J］.Int J Surg Case Rep，2021(82)：105910.
［24］Zekry KM，Yamamoto N，Hayashi K，et al.Intercalary frozen autograft for reconstruction of malignant bone and soft tissue tumours［J］.Int Orthop，2017，41(7)：1481-1487.
［25］Tanzawa Y，Tsuchiya H，Shirai T，et al.Histological examination of frozen autograft treated by liquid nitrogen removed after implantation［J］.J Orthop Sci，2009，14(6)：761-768.
［26］楚天冠，师军帅.肿瘤型人工膝关节假体置换术治疗膝关节周围骨恶性肿瘤临床疗效观察［J］.肿瘤基础与临床，2023，36(6)：506-508. |
|
|
���������� 14010702070875��