|
Abstract Objective To compare the clinical results of pre-contoured plates combined with single and multiple antegrade posterior column screw via anterior approach for treatment of both columns acetabular fractures.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 33 patients with both columns acetabular fractures treated with pre-contoured plates combine single and multiple antegrade posterior column screw via anterior approach from Jan 2016 to Jun 2022.There were 23 males and 10 females,with an average of (49.8±14.2) years (range,18 to 72 years).Preoperative 3D printing of pelvic model and pre-contoured plates were applied.There were 14 cases in simple posterior column screw group and 19 cases in multiple posterior column screws group.The fracture reduction was assessed with Matta scoring system,and the hip function was evaluated with modified Merle D’Aubigne and Postel scoring system.Results All cases were followed up for 8 to 34 months with an average of (10.3±4.5) months.The acetabular fractures all healed.The operation time,intraoperative blood loss and fluoroscopy time in multiple posterior column screws group were significantly higher than simple posterior column screw group (P<0.05).No significant difference was found in fracture site healing time between the two groups (P>0.05).Fracture reduction quality was excellent in 3 cases,good in 9 cases,pool in 2 cases,the excellent and good rate was 85.7% in simple posterior column screw group,and it was excellent in 13 cases,good in 5 cases,poor in 1 case,the excellent and good rate was 94.7% in multiple posterior column screw group.No significant difference was found between the excellent and good rate of fracture reduction (P>0.05),but the rate of anatomical reduction in multiple posterior column screw group was significantly higher than simple posterior column screw group (P<0.05).The hip function was excellent in 4 cases,good in 8 cases,fair in 2 cases,the excellent and good rate was 85.7% in simple posterior column screw group,and excellent in 7 cases,good in 9 cases,fair in 3 case,the excellent and good rate was 84.2% in multiple posterior column screw group.No significant difference was found between the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusion Pre contoured plates combined with single and multiple posterior column screw via anteriopr approach for treatment of two-columns acetabular fracture have good clinical effecacy.Multiple posterior column screws can get better reduction and fixation.
|
|
|
|
|
[1]G-nsslen A,Frink M,Hildebrand F,et al.Both column fractures of the acetabulum:epidemiology,operative management and longtermresults[J].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech,2012,79(2):107-113.
[2]Yang Y,Tang TT,Zou C,et al.Clinical outcomes of the modified Stoppa combined with iliac fossa approach for complex acetabular fractures:A medium and long term retrospective study[J].Orthop Surg,2022,14(9):1998-2005.
[3]Wu H,Shang R,Cai X,et al.Single ilioinguinal approach to treat complex acetabular fractures with quadrilateral plate involvement:Outcomes using a novel dynamic anterior platescrew system[J].Orthop Surg,2020,12(2):488-497.
[4]Wenzel L,von Rüden C,Thannheimer A,et al.The pararectus approach in acetabular surgery:Radiological and clinical outcome[J].J Orthop Trauma,2020,34(2):82-88.
[5]Huang JH,Liao H,Tan XY,et al.Surgical treatment for both column acetabular fractures using pre-operative virtual simulation and three-dimensional printing techniques[J].Chin Med J (Engl),2020,133(4):395-401.
[6]Zou R,Wu M,Guan J,et al.Therapeutic effect of acetabular fractures using the pararectus approach combined with 3D printing technique[J].Orthop Surg,2020,12(6):1854-1858.
[7] Pierannunzii L,Fischer F,Tagliabue L,et al.Acetabular both-column fractures:Essentials of operative management[J].Injury,2010,41(11):1145-1149.
[8]G-nsslen A,Krettek C.Internal fixation of acetabular bothcolumn fractures via the ilioinguinal approach[J].Oper Orthop Traumatol,2009,21(3):270-282.
[9]杨杰,王朝晖,何波涌,等.3D打印技术辅助髂腹股沟入路治疗髋臼双柱骨折[J].实用骨科杂志,2020,26(3):206-209.
[10]Matta JM.Operative treatment of acetabular fractures through the ilioinguinal approach:A 10-year perspective[J].J Orthop Trauma,2006,20(1Suppl):S20-29.
[11]Hinz N,Dehoust J,Münch M,et al.Biomechanical analysis of fxation methods in acetabular fractures:A systematic review of test setups[J].Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg,2022,48(5):3541-3560.
[12]Giordano V,Acharya MR,Pires RE,et al.Associated both-column acetabular fracture:An overview of operative steps and surgical technique[J].J Clin Orthop Trauma,2020,11(6):1031-1038.
[13]Pohlemann T,Herath SC,Braun BJ,et al.Anterior approaches to the acetabulum:Which one to choose?[J].EFORT Open Rev,2020,5(10):707-712.
[14]曹奇勇,吴宏华,孙旭,等.腹直肌旁入路与髂腹股沟入路内固定治疗髋臼骨折围手术期结果的前瞻性随机对照研究[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2021,23(6):513-518.
[15]李亚光,张元智,史志强,等.髋臼后柱顺行螺钉固定钉道的有限元分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2021,29(3):249-253.
[16]曹烈虎,周启荣,翁蔚宗,等.前柱钢板联合后柱拉力螺钉固定复杂髋臼骨折的生物力学研究[J].第二军医大学学报,2017,38(11):1397-1402.
[17]Le Quang H,Schmoelz W,Lindtner RA,et al.Single column plate plus other column lag screw fxation vs.both column plate fxation for anterior column with posterior hemitransverse acetabular fractures:A biomechanical analysis using diferent loading protocols[J].Injury,2021,52(4):699-704.
[18]黄进成,刘曦明,蔡贤华,等.前路钛板加方形区螺钉联合后柱螺钉治疗髋臼双柱骨折的有限元分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2014,22(14):1104-1110.
[19]Wu H,Shao Q,Song C,et al.Personalized three-dimensional printed anterior titanium plate to treat double-column acetabular fractures:A retrospective case-control study[J].Orthop Surg,2020,12(4):1212-1222. |
|
|