|
Abstract Objective To investigate the clinical effect of 3D printing assisted pedicle screw placement combined with improved posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF)in the treatment of degenerative scoliosis.Methods From March 2020 to March 2022,47 patients with degenerative scoliosis admitted to the Spinal Surgery Department of Chengyang District People’s Hospital in Qingdao were randomLy divided into an observation group and a control group.The control group consisted of 23 patients,including 11 males and 12 females with an age range of 54~76 years and an average age of (63.09±6.22)years.The patients of control group underwent conventional posterior pedicle screw fixation and PLIF surgery.The observation group consisted of 24 patients,including 11 males and 13 females with an age range of 51~72 years and an average age of (60.64±5.65)years.The patients underwent posterior pedicle screw fixation and modified PLIF surgery with the preoperative use of 3D printing technology to develop a surgical plan while preserving the posterior longitudinal ligament complex.The surgical time,fluoroscopy times,screw placement time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative drainage volume,Japanese orthopaedic association(JOA) spinal cord function score,visual analogue scale(VAS) pain score,Oswestry disability index(ODI)score changes at preoperative,1 month,6 months,and 12 months,Cobb angle changes at preoperative and final followup,screw placement status,and occurrence of complications were compared between the two groups.Results The measurements of the actual diameter and length of the pedicle screws,the distance from the entry point to the posterior midline,and the pedicle screw angulation in the observation group were similar to the preoperative measurements of the pedicle screws,with no statistically significant differences (P>0.05).The observation group had significantly higher acceptable and accurate screw placement rates during surgery compared to the control group (P<0.05).The observation group had significantly shorter surgical time,fewer fluoroscopy times,shorter screw placement time,less intraoperative blood loss,and lower postoperative drainage volume compared to the control group (P<0.05).All patients underwent follow-up for an average of (13.20±2.51)months,with a follow-up period of 12~18 months.The observation group had significantly better VAS scores,JOA scores,and ODI scores at 1 month,6 months,and 12 months postoperatively compared to the control group (P<0.05).In terms of complications,the observation group had significantly better outcomes than the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion The application of 3D printing assisted screw placement combined with improved PLIF in the treatment of degenerative scoliosis can significantly reduce surgical time,fluoroscopy frequency,screw placement time,intraoperative bleeding,and postoperative drainage volume,improve surgical efficiency and safety,effectively reduce secondary trauma and fluoroscopy radiation damage caused by surgery,protect the physical health of surgical staff and patients,and effectively alleviate postoperative pain of patients.It also has a significant promoting effect on the recovery of postoperative spinal function in patients,and can to some extent reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications.
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Zhou Zhenggang
|
|
|
|
[1]McAviney J,Roberts C,Sullivan B,et al.The prevalence of adult de novo scoliosis:A systematic review and metaanalysis[J].Eur Spine J,2020,29(12):2960-2969.
[2]York PJ,Kim HJ.Degenerative Scoliosis[J].Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med,2017,10(4):547-558.
[3]Kushioka J,Kaito T,Chijimatsu R,et al.The small compound,TD-198946,protects against intervertebral degeneration by enhancing glycosaminoglycan synthesis in nucleus pulposus cells[J].Sci Rep,2020,10(1):14190.
[4]Sun W,Gao J,Zhu L,et al.Effect of spinal manipulation on degenerative scoliosis[J].J Tradit Chin Med,2020,40(6):146-153.
[5]袁宁,田伟,刘波,等.成人脊柱侧凸的手术治疗策略[J].骨科临床与研究杂志,2017,2(3):159-164.
[6]李洪珂,郝申申,王鹏程,等.3D打印导航模板辅助特发性脊柱侧弯椎弓根螺钉置入的准确性[J].中国组织工程研究,2020,24(30):4757-4762.
[7]何守玉,朱锋,邱勇.成人脊柱侧凸分型方法与手术治疗策略[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2014,22(9):799-803.
[8]李洪珂,董胜利,刘帅,等.3D打印导航模板辅助置钉在脊柱侧弯术中的应用价值[J].生物医学工程与临床,2002,26(3):300-306.
[9]Lu S,Zhang YZ,Wang Z,et al.Accuracy and efficacy of thoracic pedicle screws in scoliosis with patientspecific drill template[J].Med Biol Eng Comput,2012,50(7):751-758.
[10]邹德波,周东生,张凯宁,等.成人退行性脊柱侧凸的研究进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2011,19(15):1270-1272.
[11]郑如庚,邸玉娜,薛宏伟,等.后路椎弓根钉棒与椎间植骨联合内固定治疗退行性脊柱侧弯的疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2022,18(42):4452-4455.
[12]方旭,白宇,陆生林.3D打印联合椎内固定对退行性腰椎侧弯患者功能障碍、椎体融合率及减压程度的影响[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2020,19(21):2335-2338.
[13]Kuznia AL,Hernandez AK,Lee LU.Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis:common questions and answers[J].Am Fam Physician,2020,101(1):19-23.
[14]丁俊杰,刘文德,王珂.改良TLIF 与PLIF 手术对老年退行性脊柱侧凸合并腰椎管狭窄的疗效对比[J].甘肃医药,2021,40(11):981-983.
[15]孙晓辉,刘洋,崔明星.短与长节段融合固定退行性腰椎侧凸椎管狭窄症[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2020,28(21):1936-1940.
[16]陈宇飞,马炜,彭页,等.保留棘突韧带复合体腰椎管扩大术的早期疗效[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2019,27(9):774-778.
[17]黄飞强,冯华龙,何升华.3D打印技术在退行性脊柱侧凸矫形中的运用[J]实用骨科杂志,2018,24(8):710-714.
[18]郝申申,阿尖措,王鹏程,等.3D打印技术联合静脉滴注氨甲环酸在脊柱侧弯矫形椎弓根钉内固定术中的应用[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2021,36(7):685-687.
[19]白马恒,高东,李耀章,等.3D 数字打印技术在重度脊柱侧弯中的临床分析研究[J].现代生物医学进展,2020,20(4):722-726.
[20]马旭,邬波,柳椰,等.3D打印技术在肘关节骨折治疗中的应用[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2017,10(3):228-231.
[21]黄勇兄,郑晓青,庄见雄,等.3D打印技术在经皮椎间孔镜手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症中的应用[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2019,34(1):89-91.
[22]赵晖,邹明,胡伟,等.3D打印技术在老年退变性腰椎侧弯手术中的应用[J].郑州大学学报(医学版),2019,54(4):623-626.
[23]张同同,刘林.3D打印在脊柱侧弯矫形中的应用进展[J].甘肃医药,2021,40(3):205-207.
[24]董永涵,董玉珍,赵斌,等.保留后方韧带复合体后路腰椎椎间融合术对术后腰椎邻近节段退变的影响[J].新乡医学院学报,2019,36(3):242-245.
[25]郑铁钢,蒋帅,刘宝平,等.MISTLIF 手术治疗老年退行性腰椎滑脱症的疗效观察[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2019,34(7):694-697.
[26]张伟,姜盟盟,孙其志.腰椎术后非感染性发热的相关因素分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2020,28(18):90-92.
[27]王磊,王伟,张永兴,等.应用保留后方韧带复合体治疗峡部裂型腰椎滑脱症临床观察[J].临床军医杂志,2016,44(2):190-191.
[28]郑杰,何敏娟,王大伟,等.退变性脊柱侧弯3D打印个性化减压融合[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2021,29(15):1364-1368.
[29]张毕,陈云生,谢宝辉,等.后路精准减压椎间融合结合3D打印技术指导椎弓根钉棒系统矫形治疗退变性脊柱侧弯患者的效果[J].医疗装备,2017,30(24):30-31.
[30]赵晖,邹明,吴建明,等.3D打印技术辅助椎弓根钉内固定治疗退行性腰椎侧弯的疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2020,35(5):500-501.
[31]任睿双,胡迪,晁建虎.保留后方韧带复合体椎间融合术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2016,31(11):1192-1193. |
|
|