|
Abstract Objective To compare the curative effects of 2 operation methods of reverse shoulder arthroplasty and hemi-shoulder arthroplasty for shoulder joint dysfunction.Methods Data of patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty and hemi-shoulder arthroplasty from January 2014 to June 2018 in our hospital were collected and followed up respectively.Range of motion(ROM),Visual Analogue score(VAS),University of California at LosAngeles score(UCLA),Adjusted Constant-Murley score(CMS) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) of the last follow-up were statistically analyzed.Results In this study,we found ROM of anteflexion,extorsion and abduction in reverse shoulder arthroplasty group were(130.56±3.09)degree,(38.44±2.70)degree and(131.78±2.54)degree respectively at last follow-up,results in hemi-shoulder arthroplasty group were anteflexion (104.12±7.66) degree,extorsion (27.06±3.93)degree and abduction (123.88±4.88)degree,anteflexion,extorsion and abduction were better in reverse shoulder arthroplasty group with P<0.05.But intorsion degree was(41.67±3.39)degree in reverse shoulder arthroplasty group,with the degree of intorsion (48.76±3.29)degree in hemi-shoulder arthroplasty group,intorsion degree was relatively better in hemi-shoulder arthroplasty group with a significant P value below 0.05.The last follow-ups of UCLA,CMS and ASES in reverse shoulder arthroplasty group were (28.78±2.05),(58.89±2.80) and (74.33±2.18) correspondingly,and UCLA (26.24±2.14),CMS(56.12±2.47) and ASES (71.53±2.53) were detected in hemi-shoulder arthroplasty group,UCLA,CMSA and ASES were higher in reverse shoulder arthroplasty group through statistical analyses(P<0.05).But VAS scores in reverse shoulder arthroplasty group and in hemi-shoulder arthroplasty group were (1.22±0.44) and (1.41±0.51),which made VAS scores had no difference in comparison,with a pvalue above 0.05.Conclusion Reverse shoulder arthroplasty had relatively better postoperative shoulder function than hemi-shoulder arthroplasty method,it could enhance and improve the quality of patients` life,but this method should hold strict indications and treat it seriously.
|
|
|
|
|
[1]Wolff AL,Rosenzweig L.Anatomical and biomechanical framework for shoulder arthroplasty rehabilitation[J].J Hand Ther,2017,30(2):167-174.
[2]Lignel A,Berhouet J,Loirat MA,et al.Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures:Is the glenoid implant problematic?[J].Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2018,104(6):773-777.
[3]Grosel TW,Plummer DR,Mayerson JL,et al.Oncologic reconstruction of the proximal humerus with a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty megaprosthesis[J].J Surg Oncol,2018,118(6):867-872.
[4]Leroux TS,Basques BA,Saltzman BM,et al.Shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis:A population-based study examining utilization,adverse events,length of stay,and cost[J].Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ),2018,47(6):1-12.
[5]Irlenbusch U,Blatter G,Gebhardt K,et al.Prospective study of double-eccentric hemi shoulder arthroplasty in different aetiologies:midterm results[J].Int Orthop,2011,35(7):1015-1023.
[6]Werthel JD,Sirveaux F,Block D.Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in recent proximal humerus fractures[J].Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2018,104(6):779-785.
[7]戈允申,陈世益.肩关节功能评分系统的现状和展望[J].中华骨科杂志,2007,27(10):786-789.
[8]戴海峰,李嘉,刘凤,等.反置式全肩关节置换治疗肱骨头坏死近期临床疗效观察[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2016,24(21):2000-2003.
[9]Chalmers PN,Salazar DH,Romeo AA,et al.Comparative utilization of reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty:A comprehensive analysis of a high-volume center[J].J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2018,26(24):e504-e510.
[10]陆博,Scarlat MM.反置式肩关节成形术:择期手术的当前趋势[J].中华骨科杂志,2018,38(10):627-634.
[11]韩晓珺,戚文潇,方朝毅,等.反置式全肩关节置换术治疗巨大不可修复性肩袖损伤研究进展[J].国际骨科学杂志,2017,38(6):341-344.
[12]戴海峰,刘凤,李嘉,等.3 种手术方式治疗老年肱骨近端复杂骨折临床疗效的对比研究[J].医学研究生学报,2018,31(7):734-738.
[13]Ascione F,Kilian CM,Laughlin MS,et al.Increased scapular spine fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a humeral onlay short stem:an analysis of 485 consecutive cases[J].J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2018,27(12):2183-2190.
[14]Chae J,Siljander M,Wiater JM.Instability in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty[J].J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2018,26(17):587-596.
[15]Werner BS,Chaoui J,Walch G.Glenosphere design affects range of movement and risk of friction-type scapular impingement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty[J].Bone Joint J,2018,100(9):1182-1186.
[16]Ohl X,Bonnevialle N,Gallinet D,et al.How the greater tuberosity affects clinical outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures[J].J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2018,27(12):2139-2144.
[17]Ferrier A,Blasco L,Marcoin A,et al.Geometric modification of the humeral position after total reverse shoulder arthroplasty:what is the optimal lowering of the humerus?[J].J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2018,27(12):2207-2213.
[18]Romano AM,Oliva F,Nastrucci G,et al.Reverse shoulder arthroplasty patient personalized rehabilitation protocol.Preliminary results according to prognostic groups[J].Muscles Ligaments Tendons J,2017,7(2):263-270.
[19]Uschok S,Herrmann S,Pauly S,et al.Reverse shoulder arthroplasty:the role of physical therapy on the clinical outcome in the mid-term to long-term follow-up[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2018,138(12):1647-1652. |
[1] |
. [J]. sygkzz, 2021, 27(1): 75-78. |
|
|
|