|
|
|
Abstract Objective To evaluate the treatment efficacy of proximal femoral benign tumor with reversed non-contact bridging plates.Methods We retrospectively analyzed the 44 patients who suffered benign tumor in proximal femur and received treatment in the department of orthopaedics of Changhai hospital.After the curettage of tumor lesion and bone grafting，26 patients in Group A received the internal fixation with reversed non-contact bridging plates，while 18 patients in Group B received the external fixation with braces.The adverse events rate，the time of weight loading after operation，and Harris hip scores (one month，three months and half a year after operation respectively) between the two groups were compared.Results There was no loosening or breakage of internal fixation in Group A during the follow-up，while one patient in Group B suffered fracture in the bone grafting location.The time of weight loading after operation in Group A was shorter than that in Group B，P＜0.001.The Harris hip scores of one month and three months after operation in Group A were higher than those in Group B.Differences were statistically significant as the P values were 0.009 and 0.007，respectively.Conclusion Reversed non-contact bridging plates have a good result in the treatment of the proximal femoral benign tumor.The plate helps to shorten the time before weight loading after operation and promote the functional recovery of hip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ［1］汤小东，郭卫，杨荣利，等.股骨近端良性肿瘤的外科治疗［J］.中国骨与关节外科，2008，1(2)：124-128.
［2］赵新勇，张玉宏，杜跃华.两种内固定方式治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折临床疗效观察［J］.实用骨科杂志，2016，22(1)：64-66.
［3］Acklin YP，Bereiter H，Sommer C.Reversed LISS-DF in selected cases of complex proximal femur fractures［J］.Injury，2010，41(4)：427-429.
［4］Ma CH，Tu YK，Yu SW，et al.Reverse LISS plates for unstable proximal femoral fractures［J］.Injury，2010，41(8)：827-833.
［5］Pryce Lewis JR，Ashcroft GP.Reverse LISS plating for proximal segmental femoral fractures in the polytrauma patient：a case report［J］.Injury，2007，38(2)：235-239.
［6］Zhou F，Zhang ZS，Yang H，et al.Less invasive stabilization system(LISS) versus proximal femoral nail anti-rotation(PFNA) in treating proximal femoral fractures：a prospective randomized study［J］.J Orthop Trauma，2012，26(3)：155-162.
［7］Yao C，Zhang CQ，Jin DX，et al.Early results of reverse less invasive stabilization system plating in treating elderly intertrochanteric fractures：a prospective study compared to proximal femoral nail［J］.Chin Med J (Engl)，2011，124(14)：2150-2157.
［8］Lin SJ，Huang KC，Chuang PY，et al.The outcome of unstable proximal femoral fracture treated with reverse LISS plates［J］.Injury，2016，47(10)：2161-2168.
［9］徐利军，黄焱星，王玉川，等.LISS钢板倒置与亚洲型股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗老年不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效分析［J］.临床和实验医学杂志，2015，14(21)：1822-1824.
［10］Jiang X，Wang Y，Ma X，et al.Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus reverse less invasive stabilization system-distal femur for treating proximal femoral fractures：a meta-analysis［J］.Medicine (Baltimore)，2016，95(14)：e3168.
［11］Hou Z，Shi J，Ye H，et al.Treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures with percutaneous non-contact bridging plates［J］.Int J Surg，2014，12(5)：538-543.
［12］Hoffmann MF，Burgers TA，Mason JJ，et al.Biomechanical evaluation of fracture fixation constructs using a variable-angle locked periprosthetic femur plate system［J］.Injury，2014，45(7)：1035-1041.
［13］Konstantinidis L，Hauschild O，Beckmann NA，et al.Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures with two different minimal invasive angle-stable plates：Biomechanical comparison studies on cadaveric bones［J］.Injury，2010，41(12)：1256-1261.
［14］Lewis GS，Caroom CT，Wee H，et al.Tangential bicortical locked fixation improves stability in vancouver B1 periprosthetic femur fractures：a biomechanical study［J］.J Orthop Trauma，2015，29(10)：e364-370.
［15］W-hnert D，Schr-der R，Schulze M，et al.Biomechanical comparison of two angular stable plate constructions for periprosthetic femur fracture fixation［J］.Int Orthop，2014，38(1)：47-53.
［16］Erhardt JB，Grob K，Roderer G，et al.Treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures with the non-contact bridging plate：a new angular stable implant［J］.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg，2008，128(4)：409-416. |
|
|
���������� 14010702070875��