Abstract:Objective〓This study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of 3D printing screw guides with navigation in assisting surgery for sacroiliac screw placement.Methods〓We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 32 patients who underwent surgical treatment for sacroiliac joint injuries using sacroiliac screws between June 2018 and June 2021.Patients were divided into two groups:The 3D printing screw guide group (17 cases) and the navigation group (15 cases).In the 3D printing screw guide group,13 males and 4 females with a mean age of (37.81±9.73)years old (range:23~56 years old) were included,with 10 cases of Tile type B and 7 cases of type C.The navigation group comprised 12 males and 3 females with a mean age of (36.23±9.35)years old (range:23~58 years old),including 9 cases of Tile type B and 6 cases of type C.We compared intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency,screw placement time,intraoperative blood loss,and postoperative complications between the two groups.Pelvic function was evaluated one year postoperatively using the Majeed score,and fracture reduction was assessed using Matta criteriaResults〓 There were no wound infection or nerve injury complications in either group.All patients were followed up for an average of (19.82±0.25)months (range:12~32 months).Comparisons between the two groups revealed no significant difference in intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency (P>0.05).However,intraoperative blood loss was higher in the 3D printing screw guide group than in the navigation group (P<0.05).Conversely,screw placement time was shorter in the 3D printing screw guide group compared to the navigation group (P<0.05).According to Matta criteria,the 3D printing screw guide group had 12 excellent,4 good,and 1 fair cases,while the navigation group had 11 excellent,3 good,and 1 fair cases (P>0.05).According to Majeed score at one year after operation,ranged from 67 to 93,mean (85.76±6.86) in 3D printing screw guide group,and ranged from 68 to 92,mean (86.47±7.37) in the navigation group(P>0.05).Conclusion〓 The use of 3D printing screw guides in assisting sacroiliac screw placement surgery offers advantages such as reduced screw placement time,accurate nail placement,and does not require high-tech equipment.This approach could be promoted in clinical practice.
[1]Routt ML Jr,Meier MC,Kregor PJ,et al.Percutaneous iliosacral screws with the patient supine technique[J].Oper Tech Orthop,1993,3(1):35-45.
[2]Hosny H,Mohamed MA,Elsayed M,et al.One sacroiliac screw for posterior ring fixation in unstable pelvic fractures[J].Acta Orthop Belg,2021,87(3):411-418.
[3]徐饶,刘杰,徐松,等.3D打印技术辅助全膝关节置换术治疗合并关节外畸形的膝骨关节炎的疗效[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2021,14(7):600-605.
[4]阳宏奇,雷青,蔡立宏,等.3D 打印导板辅助空心螺钉内固定治疗不稳定性骨盆骨折[J].中国修复重建外科杂志[J].2018,32(2):145-151.
[5]Yi Liu,Wu Zhou,Tian Xia,et al.Application of the guiding template designed by three-dimensional printing data for the insertion of sacroiliac screws:A new clinical technique[J].Current Medical Science,2018,38(6):1090-1095.
[6]Kaneyama S,Sugawara T,Sumi M.Safe and accurate midcervical pedicle screw insertion procedure with the patient-specific screw guide template system[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2015,40(6):E341-348.
[7]Tile M.Pelvic ring fractures:Should they be fixed?[J].J Bone Joint Surg(Br),1988,70(1):1-12.
[8]Matta JM,Tornetta P 3rd.Internal fixation of unstable pelvic ring injuries[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,1996(329):129-140.
[9]Majeed SA.Grading the outcome of pelvic fractures[J].J Bone Joint Surg(Br),1989,71(2):304-306.
[10]Li CL.Clinical comparative analysis on unstable pelvic fractures in the treatment with percutaneous sacroiliac screws and sacroiliac joint anterior plate fixation[J].Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci,2014,18(18):2704-2708.
[11]Kim CH,Kim JW.Plate versus sacroiliac screw fixation for treating posterior pelvic ring fracture:A Systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Injury,2020,51(10):2259-2266.
[12]Conflitti JM,Graves ML,Chip Routt ML Jr.Radiographic quantification and analysis of dysmorphic upper sacral osseous anatomy and associated iliosacral screw insertions[J].J Orthop Trauma,2010,24(10):630-636.
[13]Miller AN,Routt ML Jr.Variations in sacral morphology and implications for iliosacral screw fixation[J].J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2012,20(1):8-16.
[14]Yong Zhao,Libo You,Wei Lian,et al.Anatomical relation between S1 sacroiliac screws’ entrance points and superior gluteal artery[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2018,18;13(1):15.
[15]Lu S,Yang K,Lu C,et al.O-arm navigation for sacroiliac screw placement in the treatment for posterior pelvic ring injury[J].Int Orthop,2021,45(7):1803-1810.
[16]江伟,杨灵,汪红,等.骨科机器人辅助下骶髂关节螺钉治疗骨盆后环骨折的疗效研究[J].华西医学,2022,37(4):550-555.
[17]李灿辉,吴征杰,曾焰辉,等.骨科手术机器人辅助与传统透视下经皮骶髂螺钉置入的优劣分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2022,26(9):1434-1438.
[18]Zhao Y,Jiang CQ,Sun T,et al.Study on the precision of the robot-assisted sacroiliac screw placement[J].Zhonghua Yixue Zazhi,2020,100(35):2763-2767.
[19]周武,刘毅,刘国晖,等.3D打印导板技术辅助与透视辅助骶髂关节置钉的对比研究[J].中华创伤杂志,2018,34(6):484-489.