非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术在髋臼骨折术后继发病变中的研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1655 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的评价非骨水泥型人工全髋关节置换术(total hip arthroplasty，THA)在治疗髋臼骨折术后继发病变的临床效果、影像学结果及术后并发症等，并比较不同涂层假体之间的差异。方法回顾性纳入2015年1月至2017年1月因髋臼骨折术后继发病变在红会医院骨坏死与关节重建病区行THA的65例患者。男39例，女26例；平均年龄(46.5±18.6)岁；35例使用钽金属涂层的假体，30例使用羟基磷灰石涂层的假体。应用髋关节功能评分(harris hip score，HHS)、疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analog scale，VAS)、生活质量评定量表(12 item short form health survey，SF-12)、臼杯外展角等评价术后功能效果、假体稳定性，并比较不同涂层假体间的术中情况(手术时间、出血量、输血率)、随访时的效果(HHS、VAS、SF-12)、假体生存率及并发症等。结果 65例患者平均随访(6.2±0.9)年。术后1年及末次随访结果均较术前有显著改善，差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。术后1年与末次随访时臼杯外展角比较，差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。钽金属涂层组手术时间较短，术后1年随访时HHS更优，术后翻修率更低。3例随访期间因无菌性松动行翻修术。所有患者均未发生深静脉血栓、坐骨神经损伤等并发症。结论在髋臼骨折术后继发病变的治疗中，非骨水泥型THA可以获得满意的中远期临床效果。在选择非骨水泥型人工关节假体时，钽金属涂层假体的术后翻修率更低。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	王波
	许珂
	刘林
	张斌飞
	庄岩
	郝阳泉
	许鹏

关键词 ：全髋关节置换术, 非骨水泥型假体, 髋臼骨折

Abstract：

Objective To evaluate the clinical results，imaging results and postoperative complications of cementfree prostheses for the treatment of secondary acetabular fractures，and to compare these differences between different coated prostheses.Methods A total of 65 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the department of Osteonecrosis&Joint Reconstruction Surgery of Honghui hospital from January 2015 to January 2017 due to secondary lesions after acetabular fractures were retrospectively enrolled.39 males and 26 females were included，and the mean age was (46.5±18.6) years.Harris hip score (HHS)，visual analog scale (VAS)，12 item short form health survey(SF-12) and acetabular cup abduction angle were used to evaluate postoperative functional results and prosthesis stability.The intraoperative conditions (operation time，blood loss，blood transfusion rate)，followup outcomes (HHS，VAS，SF-12)，prosthesis survival rate and complications were compared between different coated prostheses.Results 65 patients were followed up (6.2±0.9)years.The results of the 1 year post operation and the last follow-up were significantly improved compared with the pre-operation，and the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in the abduction angle of acetabular cup at 1 year and last follow-up (P＞0.05).The tantalum coating group had shorter operation time，better HHS and lower revision rate at 1 year follow-up.Three patients underwent revision surgery due to aseptic loosening during follow-up.No complications such as deep vein thrombosis and sciatic nerve injury occurred in all patients.Conclusion In the treatment of postoperative lesions of acetabular fractures，cement-free total hip arthroplasty can achieve satisfactory long-term clinical results.Tantalum metal-coated prostheses have lower revision rates when selecting cement-free prostheses.

Key words： total hip replacement cement-free prosthesis acetabular fracture

基金资助:国家自然科学基金(82072432)
陕西省重点研发计划(2022SF-313)

通讯作者: 许鹏

作者简介: 王波(1986－ )，男，主治医师，西安交通大学附属红会医院关节病医院骨坏死与关节重建病区，wangbofmmu@163.com

引用本文:

王波，许珂，刘林，张斌飞，庄岩，郝阳泉，许鹏. 非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术在髋臼骨折术后继发病变中的研究[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2022, 28(11): 961-.
Wang Bo，Xu Ke，Liu Lin，Zhang Binfei，Zhuang Yan，Hao Yangquan，Xu Peng. The Application of Cement Free Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Secondary Lesions After Acetabular Fractures. sygkzz, 2022, 28(11): 961-.

链接本文:

http://www.sygkzz.com/CN/ 或 http://www.sygkzz.com/CN/Y2022/V28/I11/961

［1］Mauffrey C，Hao J，Cuellar DR，et al.The epidemiology and injury patterns of acetabular fractures：Are the USA and China comparable?［J］.Clin Orthop Relat Res，2014，472(11)：3332-3337.
［2］Tannast M，Najibi S，Matta JM.Two to twenty-year survivorship of the hip in 810 patients with operatively treated acetabular fractures［J］.J Bone Joint Surg (Am)，2012，94(17)：1559-1567.
［3］Küper MA，Konrads C，Trulson A，et al.Complications of surgical approaches for osteosynthesis treatment of acetabular fractures：Analysis of pitfalls and how to avoid them［J］.Injury，2020，51(4)：984-990.
［4］Magu NK，Gogna P，Singh A，et al.Long term results after surgical management of posterior wall acetabular fractures［J］.J Orthop Traumat，2014，15(3)：173-179.
［5］Cohen DA，Montgomery SJ，Stavrakis A，et al.Treatment of geriatric acetabular fractures—A concise review of the literature［J］.Orthop Clin North America，2021，52(4)：323-333.
［6］Ferguson TA，Patel R，Bhandari M，et al.Fractures of the acetabulum in patients aged 60 years and older：An epidemiological and radiological study［J］.J Bone Joint Surg (Br)，2010，92(2)：250-257.
［7］Buller LT，Lawrie CM，Vilella FE.A growing problem acetabular fractures in the elderly and the combined hip procedure［J］.Orthop Clin North America，2015，46(2)：215-225.
［8］Wu ES，Jauregui JJ，Banerjee S，et al.Outcomes of delayed total hip arthroplasty in patients with a previous ipsilateral acetabular fracture［J］.Expert Review Med Devices，2015，12(3)：297-306.
［9］Butterwick D，Papp S，Gofton W，et al.Acetabular fractures in the elderly：evaluation and management［J］.J Bone Joint Surg (Am)，2015，97(9)：758-768.
［10］Meding JB，Ritter MA，Davis KE，et al.Cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty using the same femoral component［J］.Hip Int，2016，26(1)：62-66.
［11］Lidder S，Epstein DJ，Scott G.A systematic review of short metaphyseal loading cementless stems in hip arthroplasty［J］.Bone Joint J，2019，101B(5)：502-511.
［12］Preston G，Heimke IM，Heindel K，et al.Survivorship of the hip joint after acetabulum fracture［J］.J American Academy Orthop Surg，2021，29(18)：781-788.
［13］Giannoudis PV，Grotz MR，Papakostidis C，et al.Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum：A meta-analysis［J］.J Bone Joint Surg (Br)，2005，87(1)：2-9.
［14］Park KS，Chan CK，Lee GW，et al.Outcome of alternative approach to displaced acetabular fractures［J］.Injury，2017，48(2)：388-393.
［15］Frietman B，Biert J，Edwards M.Patientreported outcome measures after surgery for an acetabular fracture［J］.Bone Joint J，2018，100B(5)：640-645.
［16］Boraiah S，Ragsdale M，Achor T，et al.Open reduction internal fixation and primary total hip arthroplasty of selected acetabular fractures［J］.J Oorthop Trauma，2009，23(4)：243-248.
［17］Walls A，McAdam A，McMahon SE，et al.The management of osteoporotic acetabular fractures：Current methods and future developments［J］.The Surgeon，2021，19(5)：e289-e297.
［18］Enocson A，Blomfeldt R.Acetabular fractures in the elderly treated with a primary burch-schneider reinforcement ring，Autologous bone graft，and a total hip arthroplasty：A prospective study with a 4-year follow-up［J］.J Oorthop Trauma，2014，28(6)：330-337.
［19］ClarkeJenssen J，Westberg M，Roise O，et al.Reduced survival for uncemented compared to cemented total hip arthroplasty after operatively treated acetabular fractures［J］.Injury，2017，48(11)：2534-2539.
［20］Borg T，Hailer NP.Outcome 5 years after surgical treatment of acetabular fractures：a prospective clinical and radiographic follow-up of 101 patients［J］.Archives Orthopaedic Trauma Surg，2015，135(2)：227-233.
［21］Matta JM.Fractures of the acetabulum：accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury［J］.J Bone Joint Surg (Am)，1996，78(11)：1632-1645.
［22］Nicol GM，Sanders EB，Kim PR，et al.Outcomes of total hip arthroplasty after acetabular open reduction and internal fixation in the elderly-acute vs delayed total hip arthroplasty［J］.Journal of Arthroplasty，2021，36(2)：605-611.
［23］Yang Z，Rohrl SM，Nordsletten L.Displaced acetabular fracture in elderly patients：Is acute arthroplasty an effective option?［J］.Z Orthop Unfall，2019，157(6)：676-683.
［24］McGowan SP，Myers DM，Taylor BC，et al.Difficulty of total hip arthroplasty following open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures［J］.J Long Term Eff Med Implants，2019，29(3)：247-254.
［25］Dawson P，Dunne L，Raza H，et al.Total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of osteoarthritis secondary to acetabular fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation［J］.Europ J Orthop Surg Trauma，2019，29(5)：1049-1054.
［26］Sarantis M，Stasi S，Milaras C，et al.Acute total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of acetabular fractures：A retrospective study with a six-year follow-up［J］.Cureus，2020，12(8)：e10139.
［27］Jauregui JJ，Weir TB，Chen JF，et al.Acute total hip arthroplasty for older patients with acetabular fractures：A meta-analysis［J］.J Clin Orthop Trauma，2020，11(6)：976-982.
［28］Manson TT，Slobogean GP，Nascone J W，et al.Open reduction and internal fixation alone versus open reduction and internal fixation plus total hip arthroplasty for displaced acetabular fractures in patients older than 60 years：A prospective clinical trial［J］.Injury，2022，53(2)：523-528.