尺骨鹰嘴影像学参数测量及临床意义
中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第908医院骨科
The Anatomical Parameters Measurements and Clinical Significance of the Ulna Olecranon
Department of Orthopedic Surgery,The 908th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA
摘要 目的 通过测量尺骨鹰嘴的影像学数据,为尺骨鹰嘴骨折张力带手术克氏针置入方向、角度及宽度提供理论参考。方法 回顾性收集2020年9月至2020年12月我院60例成人正常肘关节正侧位X线片,其中男30例,女30例;男性平均年龄(37.63±13.75)岁,女性平均年龄(39.70±14.60)岁。分别测量并记录肘关节正位尺骨近端内翻角、鹰嘴最狭窄处宽度,肘关节侧位鹰嘴尖端过鹰嘴窝切线与尺骨轴线的夹角。结果 尺骨近端内翻角男性平均为(10.71±2.77)°,女性平均(9.97±2.89)°,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.70);男性鹰嘴最狭窄处宽度(1.90±0.96)mm,女性(1.61±0.12)mm,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.00);鹰嘴尖端过鹰嘴窝切线与尺骨轴线的夹角男性平均(25.42±2.31)°,女性平均(23.12±2.64)°,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.10)。结论 通过测量的尺骨鹰嘴影像学参数,为鹰嘴骨折张力带手术时克氏针进针方向、角度及宽度提供参考,提高手术准确度。
关键词 :
尺骨鹰嘴 ,
X线 ,
影像学参数 ,
测量
Abstract :Objective To provide a theoretical reference for tension band fixation of olecranon fractures by measuring the anatomical parameters of the ulna olecranon. Methods From September 2020 to December 2020,anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the elbow were obtained for anatomic measurement in the retrospective study,including 30 males and 30 females.The mean age of males was (37.63±13.75)years,and that of females was (39.70±14.60)years.The following parameters were measured:the proximal ulna varus angle,the ulna olecranon width,and the angle between the tangent line of the olecranon fossa and ulna axis.Results The mean value for the proximal ulna varus angle was (10.71±2.77)°in males and (9.97±2.89)°in females,and no significant difference was observed between the two groups (P=0.70).The widths of the ulna olecranon in men(1.90±0.96)mm were significantly larger than those of females (1.61±0.12)mm (P=0.00).The angle between the tangent line of the olecranon fossa and the ulna axis was (25.42±2.31)° in males and (23.12±2.64)° in females,and no significant difference was seen between the two genders (P=0.10).Conclusion Anatomical parameters of the olecranon were measured to provide a reference for the direction,angle and width of the K-wire during tension band operations for olecranon fractures,which will improve the accuracy of such procedures.
Key words :
ulan olecranon
X-rays
anatomical parameters
measurements
通讯作者:
李浩
作者简介 : 熊绪(1990- ),男,主治医师,中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第908医院骨科,330002。
[1]Lubberts B,Mellema JJ,Janssen SJ,et al.Fracture line distribution of olecranon fractures[J].Arch Orthop Traum Su,2017,137(1):37-42.
[2]杨恺,曲宪芳,刘书茂.解剖锁定钢板联合微型钢板治疗粉碎性尺骨鹰嘴骨折[J].实用骨科杂志,2017,23(9):824-826.
[3]Powell AJ,Farhan-Alanie OM,Mcgraw IWW.Tension band wiring versus locking plate fixation for simple,two-part Mayo 2A olecranon fractures:a comparison of post-operative outcomes,complications,reoperations and economics[J].Musculoskeletal Surgery,2019,103(2):155-160.
[4]Saeed ZM,Trickett RW,Yewlett AD,et al.Factors influencing K-wire migration in tension-band wiring of olecranon fractures[J].J Shoulder Elb Surg,2014,23(8):1181-1186.
[5]van der Linden SC,van Kampen A,Jaarsma RL.Kwire position in tension-band wiring technique affects stability of wires and long-term outcome in surgical treatment of olecranon fractures[J].J Shoulder Elb Surg,2012,21(3):405-411.
[6]Hutchinson DT,Horwitz DS,Ha G,et al.Cyclic loading of olecranon fracture fixation constructs[J].J Bone Joint Surg(Am),2003,85(5):831-837.
[7]周炎,刘世清,瞿新丛.3种克氏针张力带固定方法治疗尺骨鹰嘴骨折的疗效比较[J].实用骨科杂志,2014,20(7):642-644.
[8]Sullivan CW,Desai K.Classifications in brief:Mayo classification of olecranon fractures[J].Clin Orthop Relat R,2019(477):908-910.
[9]Duckworth AD,Clement ND,White TO,et al.Plate versus tension-band wire fixation for olecranon fractures:A prospective randomized trial[J].J Bone Joint Surg(Am),2017,99(15):1261-1273.
[10]路遥,韩康,王谦,等.解剖锁定接骨板与克氏针张力带内固定治疗尺骨鹰嘴骨折的疗效比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2020,35(7):697-699.
[11]Rantalaiho IK,Miikkulainen AE,Laaksonen IE,et al.Treatment of displaced olecranon fractures:A systematic review[J].Scand J Surg,2021,110(1):13-21.
[12]庄云强,张军,周龙,等.带孔折断式克氏针张力带固定治疗成人尺骨鹰嘴骨折的疗效[J].中华创伤杂志,2020,36(2):148-152.
[13]孙浩,谢睿恒,李志,等.带孔金属骨针联合钛缆张力带固定治疗尺骨鹰嘴骨折疗效分析[J].实用骨科杂志,2020,26(3):255-257.
[14]Hopf JC,Jöhnig A,Jorg T,et al.Computer tomographic analysis of anatomic characteristics of the ulna – essential parameters for preshaped implants[J].PLoS One,2020,15(5):e0232988.
[15]Jones TB,Karenz AR,Weinhold PS,et al.Transcortical screw fixation of the olecranon shows equivalent strength and improved stability compared with tension band fixation[J].J Orthop Trauma,2014,28(3):137-142.
[16]戚晓阳,邱旭升,施鸿飞,等.克氏针进针角度对尺骨鹰嘴横形骨折张力带固定稳定性的影响[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2018,33(11):1215-1217.
[1]
朱琦 1,娄楠 1,余志才 1,慕晶晶 2. 中国人髋臼下部螺钉三维位置研究 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2021, 27(8): 704-731.
[2]
马任驰,王智慧,郑卓肇 *. 下肢旋转对站立位下肢全长髋-膝-踝角的影响 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2021, 27(7): 663-665.
[3]
泮学贞 1,武世勋 2,刘时璋 2*. 成人大骨节病足舟骨解剖形态三维CT测量及分析 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2021, 27(4): 377-379.
[4]
孙浩,谢睿恒,李志,岳勇 *. 带孔金属骨针联合钛缆张力带固定治疗尺骨鹰嘴骨折疗效分析 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2020, 26(3): 255-257.
[5]
王志生 1,杨海涛 2,吴志新 1,吴爱民 1. 一种新型方法评估下胫腓关节损伤的临床意义 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2019, 25(7): 596-598.
[6]
吴厦 1,2,王君玲 3,曹光磊 1*,安帅 1,杨光中 1,王研农 1. 胫骨高位截骨术相关角度的X线片测量及3D重建测量差异分析 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2019, 25(5): 419-422.
[7]
吕刚,王利昕,杜佳,孟庆才 *. 螺旋CT在髋臼骨折术后评价及与X线检查的对比探讨 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2019, 25(5): 453-455.
[8]
毛兆虎 1,韩康 1,于兴胜 1,刘华 2,王平山 1*. 3D打印辅助经尺骨鹰嘴截骨治疗肱骨髁间骨折 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2019, 25(12): 1124-1127.
[9]
孔祥喆 1,谢庆云 2,黄鹏 1. X线联合CT加权均数测量双束韧带重建术后骨隧道 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2019, 25(12): 1135-1137.
[10]
张昆,刘家帮,李冬,张清华,裴征,关振鹏 *. 老年肱骨远端骨折不同手术入路疗效评价 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2019, 25(11): 1012-1015.
[11]
刘洁 1,刘安 2*. 多种影像学方法对痛风性关节炎诊断价值的临床研究 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2018, 24(4): 380-381.
[12]
杨恺,曲宪芳,刘书茂. 解剖锁定钢板联合微型钢板治疗粉碎性尺骨鹰嘴骨折 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2017, 23(9): 824-826.
[13]
石思李,李胜 *,邹文远,刘玥,曹阳. 儿童肘关节隐匿性骨折X线诊断及征象分析 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2017, 23(1): 86-89.