锁定接骨板治疗桡骨远端不稳定性骨折疗效对比

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1789 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy of universal double column locking plate and T-shapedlocking plate in the treatment of unstable distal radius fractures.Methods From January 2016 to January 2018，68 patients with unstable distal radius fractures who underwent orthopedic surgery in our hospital were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group.The experimental group was treated with the volar approach.T-shaped locking compression plate treatment，the control group was treated with universal double column locking plate.There were 34 patients in the experimental group，including 16 males and 18 females aged 46~75 years with an average of (54.16±12.54).There were 34 patients in the control group，including 18 males and 16 females aged 44~77 years with an average age of (53.27±13.74).The bone healing time，wrist joint mobility，imaging related indicators，wrist joint function scores and postoperative complications were compared before and after surgery.Results The wrist joint activity of the control group was significantly better than that of the experimental group (P＜0.05).The palm tilt angle and ulnar deviation angle of the group were significantly better than those before operation (P＜0.05).The palm tilt angle and ulnar angle of the control group were significantly better than the experimental group (P＜0.05)；There was no significant difference in the time of bone healing between the control group and the bone healing time of the experimental group (P＞0.05).The wrist function activity score of control group was significantly better than the test group at 6 months after surgery (P＜0.05)，and thecomplication rateof control group was significantly less than the test group(P＜0.05).Conclusion The universal double column locking plate is used to treat unstable fractures of the distal radius.The reduction effect is good.The wrist joints have good motion，the wrist joint function score is high，and the complications are few，which is obviously better than the T-shapedlocking plate.

Key words： universal double column locking plate T shapedlocking compression plate unstable distal radius fracture clinical effect

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Zheng Zepeng
	Sun Yuming *

Cite this article:

Zheng Zepeng,Sun Yuming *. Comparative Study of the Treatment of Unstable Fractures of the Distal Radius with Locking Plate[J]. sygkzz, 2019, 25(10): 879-882.

URL:

http://www.sygkzz.com/EN/ OR http://www.sygkzz.com/EN/Y2019/V25/I10/879

［1］王亦璁.骨与关节损伤［M］.北京：人民卫生出版社，2007：735.
［2］张宇轩，谢仁国，许亚军，等.万向双柱锁定接骨板与T型锁定接骨板治疗桡骨远端骨折疗效的比较［J］.中华手外科杂志，2015，16(1)：54-55.
［3］彭辉，庄小强，陆生林，等.桡骨远端T型锁定接骨板对老年桡骨远端不稳定性骨折患者的疗效观察［J］.临床医学研究与实践，2017，8(13)：42.
［4］朱良运.T型锁定接骨板和万向双柱锁定接骨板对桡骨远端外伤性C型骨折的疗效对比分析［J］.解放军医药杂志，2015，14(12)：24.
［5］Ayong S，Traore A，Postlethwaite D，et al.Functional evaluation of unstable distal radius fractures treated with an angle-stable volar T-plate［J］.Acta Orthopaedica Belgica，2014，80(2)：183-189.
［6］Matzon JL，Kenniston J，Beredjiklian PK.Hardware-related complications after dorsal plating for displaced distal radius fractures［J］.Orthopedics (Online)，2014，37(11)：e978-982.
［7］钱光，吴俊国，董有海，等.掌侧锁定接骨板结合背侧支撑钢板固定治疗不稳定的背侧移位桡骨远端骨折［J］.中国矫形外科杂志，2016，22(12)：44-45.
［8］康宝林，王东建，张鑫.掌侧与背侧入路切开复位内固定治疗C型桡骨远端骨折的比较研究［J］.实用骨科杂志，2016，22(3)：36-37.
［9］白晓冬，王宝军，赵亮，等.远端万向锁定加压双柱接骨板治疗桡骨远端骨折［J］.中华创伤骨科杂志，2015，18 (9)：55.
［10］刘海涛.DVR解剖型掌侧锁定接骨板治疗C型桡骨远端骨折的临床疗效［J］.中华骨与关节外科杂志，2016，14 (6)：42.
［11］林奇生，王一民，曾瑞芬，等.掌侧锁定接骨板治疗C型桡骨远端骨折的临床效果［J］.临床医学，2016，9(9)：12.
［12］Hart A，Collins M，Chhatwal D，et al.Can the use of variable-angle volar locking plates compensate for suboptimal plate positioning in unstable distal radius fractures? A biomechanical study［J］.J Orthop Trauma，2015，29(1)：e1-6.
［13］Magnus CR，Arnold CM，Johnston G，et al.Cross-education for improving strength and mobility after distal radius fractures：a randomized controlled trial［J］.Arch Phys Med Rehabil，2013，94(7)：1247-1255.