不同骨水泥注入方案治疗单节段胸腰段OVCF临床对比研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (735 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract

Objective To investigate the influence of bone cement injection schemes by unilateral，near middle-line and bilateral on postoperative pain degree and perioperative complications of patients with single segment thoracolumbar OVCF.Methods 165 patients with single segment thoracolumbar OVCF were chosen from July 2015 to March 2017 and randomly divided into three group including A group (55 patients) with bone cement injection schemes by unilateral，B group (55 patients) with bone cement injection schemes by near middle-line and C group (55 patients) with bone cement injection schemes by bilateral；and the pain VAS score before and after operation，intraoperative and postoperative complication incidence of both groups were compared.Results The pain VAS score in 1d after operation of B group and C group were significantly lower than A group(P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in the pain VAS score in 12 weeks，24 weeks and 48 weeks after operation between 2 groups(P＞0.05).The bone cement leakage incidence of C group were significantly lower than A group and B group(P＜0.05).The re-cement injection rate of A group were significantly higher than B group and C group(P＜0.05).Conclusion Compared with bone cement injection schemes by unilateral，bone cement injection schemes by near middle-line and bilateral in the treatment of patients with single segment thoracolumbar OVCF can efficiently relieve early postoperative pain and reduce perioperative risk of complications.

Key words： bone cement thoracolumbar segments osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture pain complications

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Wang Fushun
	Zhang Lin
	Wang Zhiqi
	et al

Cite this article:

Wang Fushun,Zhang Lin,Wang Zhiqi, et al. Influence of Different Bone Cement Injection on Patients with Single Segment Thoracolumbar OVCF[J]. sygkzz, 2019, 25(2): 97-100.

URL:

http://www.sygkzz.com/EN/ OR http://www.sygkzz.com/EN/Y2019/V25/I2/97

［1］Chang X，Lv YF，Chen B，et al.Vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture：a meta-analysis of prospective comparative studies［J］.Int Orthop，2015，39(3)：491-500.
［2］Wang CH，Ma JZ，Zhang CC，et al.Comparison of high-viscosity cement vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures［J］.Pain Physician，2015，18(2)：187-194.
［3］Zhang L，Liu Z，Wang J，et al.Unipedicular versus bipedicular percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures：a prospective randomized study［J］.BMC Musculoskelet Disord，2015，16(1)：145.
［4］Liang D，Ye LQ，Jiang XB，et al.Biomechanical effects of cement distribution in the fractured area on osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures：a three-dimensional finite element analysis［J］.J Surg Res，2015，195(1)：246-256.
［5］陈安民，田伟.骨科学［M］.北京：人民卫生出版社，2014：89--92.
［6］Liang L，Chen X，Jiang W，et al.Balloon kyphoplasty or percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture? An updated systematic review and metaanalysis［J］.Ann Saudi Med，2016，36(3)：165-174.
［7］Zhao G，Wei W，Gao WS，et al.Comparison the clinical outcomes and complications of high-viscosity versus low-viscosity in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures［J］.Medicine，2017，96(48)：e8936.
［8］Li J，Li T，Ma Q，et al.Using side-opening injection cannulas to prevent cement leakage in percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures，does it really work?［J］.J Orthop Sci，2017，22(5)：811-815.
［9］Sun H，Lu PP，Liu YJ，et al.Can unilateral kyphoplasty replace bilateral kyphoplasty in treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures? A systematic review and metaanalysis［J］.Pain Physician，2016，19(8)：551-563.
［10］Sun HB，Jing XS，Liu YZ，et al.The optimal volume fraction in percutaneous vertebroplasty evaluated by pain relief，cement dispersion，and cement leakage：A prospective cohort study of 130 patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture in the thoracolumbar vertebra［J］.World Neurosurg，2018，33(1)：102-107.
［11］Zhang ZF，Yang JL，Jiang HC，et al.An updated comparison of high-and low-viscosity cement vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures：A retrospective cohort study［J］.Int J Surg，2017，43(3)：126-130.
［12］Schupfner R，Stoevelaar HJ，Blattert T，et al.Treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures：Applicability of appropriateness criteria in clinical practice［J］.Pain Physician，2016，19(1)：E113.
［13］Kim HS，Ju CI.Spinal instability predictive scoring system for subsequent fractures after bone cement augmentation in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures［J］.World Neurosurgery，2017，106(10)：736-745.
［14］Liang Z，Qiang W，Lin W，et al.Bone cement distribution in the vertebral body affects chances of recompression after percutaneous vertebroplasty treatment in elderly patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures［J］.Clin Interv Aging，2017，12(2)：431-436.
［15］Guo D，Cai J，Zhang S，et al.Treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with intraosseous vacuum phenomena using high-viscosity bone cement via bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty［J］.Medicine，2017，96(14)：e6549.
［16］Liu T，Li Z，Su Q，et al.Cement leakage in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with cortical defect using high-viscosity bone cement during unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty surgery［J］.Medicine，2017，96(25)：e7216.