胫骨干骨折采用髌上、髌下入路髓内钉治疗的疗效对比

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (2)

Download: PDF (1125 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To analyze the differences of surgical operation and therapeutic effect between the suprapatellar approach and the infrapatellar approach in treatment of tibial shaft fractures.Methods 34 patients with tibial shaft fractures were treated with intramedullary nail in our hospital during November，2014 to November，2015.They were selected and divided into two groups according to the operation，17 cases of the suprapatellar approach group(group A)and 17 cases of the infrapatellar approach group(group B).The clinical date about operation time，amount of bleeding，number of fluoroscopy，postoperative complications，fracture healing rate，fracture healing time，incidence of postoperative knee pain，postoperative Lysholm knee score were compared in this study.Results The number of fluoroscopy in group A (8.8±1.2) was less than that in group B (10.9±2.0)，the incidence of knee pain in group A (5.9％) was significantly lower than that in group B (41.2％)，Lysholm knee score (87.9 points) was higher than that in group B (83.9 points)，the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).There was no significant difference between the two groups in operation time，amount of bleeding，postoperative complications，fracture healing rate and healing time (P＞0.05).Conclusion Patients with tibial shaft fractures treated with suprapatellar approach intramedullary nail had fewer fluoroscopy than infrapatellar approach，with a lower incidence of postoperative knee pain and better postoperative knee function recovery.

Key words： tibial shaft fracture suprapatellar approach infrapapillary approach intraoperative fluoroscopy knee pain

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors

Cite this article:

URL:

http://www.sygkzz.com/EN/ OR http://www.sygkzz.com/EN/Y2017/V23/I9/794

［1］Xia L，Zhou J，Zhang Y，et al.A meta-analysis of reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing for the treatment of closed tibial fractures［J］.Orthopedics，2014，37(4)：332-338.
［2］Ryan SP，Tornetta P，Dielwart C，et al.Knee pain correlates with union after tibial nailing［J］.J Orthop Trauma，2011，25(12)：731-735.
［3］Katsoulis E，CourtBrown C，Giannoudis PV.Incidence and aetiology of anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of the femur and tibia［J］.J Bone Joint Surg(Br)，2006，88(5)：576.
［4］Tornetta P，Collins E.Semiextended position of intramedullary nailing of the proximal tibia［J］.Clin Orthop Relat Res，1996(328)：185-189.
［5］Freedman EL，Johnson EE.Radiographic analysis of tibial fracture malalignment following intramedullary nailing［J］.Clin Orthop Relat Res，1995(315)：25-33.
［6］Sun Q，Nie X，Gong J，et al.The outcome comparison of the suprapatellar approach and infrapatellar approach for tibia intramedullary nailing［J］.Int Orthop，2016，40(12)：2611-2617.
［7］季滢瑶，郑钜晗，黄忠胜，等.胫骨干骨折髓内钉固定术中置钉点的影像学研究及临床应用［J］.浙江创伤外科，2012，17(4)：448-451.
［8］Leliveld MS，Verhofstad MH.Injury to the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve，a possible cause for anterior knee pain after tibial nailing?［J］.Injury，2012，43(6)：779-783.
［9］Tahririan MA，Ziaei E，Osanloo R.Significance of the position of the proximal tip of the tibial nail：An important factor related to anterior knee pain［J］.Adv Biomed Res，2014，3(14)：119.
［10］Gaines RJ，Rockwood J，Garland J，et al.Comparison of insertional trauma between suprapatellar and infrapatellar portals for tibial nailing［J］.Orthopedics，2013，36(9)：1155-1158.
［11］Gelbke MK，Coombs D，Powell S，et al.Suprapatellar versus infrapatellar intramedullary nail insertion of the tibia：a cadaveric model for comparison of patellofemoral contact pressures and forces［J］.J Orthop Trauma，2010，24(11)：665-671.
［12］Avilucea FR，Triantafillou K，Whiting PS，et al.Suprapatellar intramedullary nail technique lowers rate of malalignment of distal tibia fractures［J］.J Orthop Trauma，2016，30(10)：557-560.
［13］Sanders RW，Dipasquale TG，Jordan CJ，et al.Semiextended intramedullary nailing of the tibia using a suprapatellar approach：radiographic results and clinical outcomes at a minimum of 12 months followup［J］.J Orthop Trauma，2014，28(5)：245-255.
［14］Eastman JG，Tseng SS，Lee MA，et al.The retropatellar portal as an alternative site for tibial nail insertion：a cadaveric study［J］.J Orthop Trauma，2010，24(11)：659-664.