Abstract：Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of integrated surgical rehabilitation model and conventional rehabilitation model for postoperative treatment of proximal humerus fractures.Methods A total of 100 patients with proximal humerus fractures who received PHILOS plate internal fixation in the department of orthopaedics of Shanghai Seventh People’s Hospital from January 2017 to December 2018 were collected.Patients were divided into two groups according to the random number table：traditional rehabilitation group and graded rehabilitation group，with 50 cases in each group.Patients in the traditional rehabilitation group received shoulder joint function rehabilitation according to the rehabilitation guidelines.In the graded rehabilitation group，the corresponding rehabilitation program was adopted according to Safety assessment of early rehabilitation.Patients were followed up at 4 time points：1 day after surgery，2 weeks after surgery，1 month after surgery and 3 months after surgery，and the Neer scores of shoulder joints in the two groups were compared.The incidence of adverse reactions was recorded and compared between the two groups throughout the follow-up period.Results A total of 91 patients were followed up，including 45 patients in the traditional rehabilitation group and 46 patients in the graded rehabilitation group.Neer scores of shoulder joints in the two groups showed a gradually increasing trend at 4 time points of 1 day after surgery，2 weeks after surgery，1 month after surgery and 3 months after surgery (P＜0.05).Neer scores of the graded rehabilitation group were significantly better than those of the traditional rehabilitation group at 2 weeks and 1 month after surgery，but there was no significant difference in Neer scores between the two groups at 3 months after surgery(P＞0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups(P＞0.05).Conclusion Guiding postoperative rehabilitation of proximal humerus fractures with the mode of integrated surgery and rehabilitation can significantly improve the efficiency of rehabilitation，while not increasing the incidence of complications.
余翔 1，李旭 1，王拥军 2. 采用手术康复一体化模式治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效观察[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2019, 25(9): 776-780.
Yü Xiang 1，Li Xu 1，Wang Yongjun 2. Clinical Observation of the Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fracture with the Integrated Model of Operation and Rehabilitation. sygkzz, 2019, 25(9): 776-780.
［1］Handoll HH，Brorson S.Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults［J］.Cochrane Database Syst Rev，2015，(11)：Cd000434.
［2］Malavolta EA，Assuncao JH，Gracitelli MEC，et al.Correlation between the UCLA and Constant-Murley scores in rotator cuff repairs and proximal humeral fractures osteosynthesis［J］.Rev Bras Ortop，2018，53(4)：441-447.
［3］Helfen T，Sprecher CM，Eberli U，et al.High-resolution tomography-based quantification of cortical porosity and cortical thickness at the surgical neck of the humerus during aging［J］.Calcif Tissue Int，2017，101(3)：271-279.
［4］Mellstrand Navarro C，Brolund A，Ekholm C，et al.Treatment of humerus fractures in the elderly：A systematic review covering effectiveness，safety，economic aspects and evolution of practice［J］.PLoS One，2018，13(12)：e0207815.
［5］戴闽，帅浪，范红先，等.骨折术后运动康复安全评定的几点体会［J］.医学与哲学(临床决策论坛版)，2010，31(5)：34-36.
［6］Nishimoto A，Otaka Y，Kasuga S，et al.Robotic assessment of upper limb function after proximal humeral fracture：personal experience as A patient and occupational therapist［J］.Keio J Med，2016，65(3)：57-63.
［7］Liu YW，Wei XE，Kuang Y，et al.Open vs.closed reduction combined with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in humeral fractures［J］.Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol，2016，25(4)：215-221.
［8］Tan E，Lie D，Wong MK.Early outcomes of proximal humerus fracture fixation with locking plate and intramedullary fibular strut graft［J］.Orthopedics，2014，37(9)：e822-e827.
［9］Mao F，Zhang DH，Peng XC，et al.Comparison of surgical versus non-surgical treatment of displaced 3 and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus：a meta-analysis［J］.J Invest Surg，2015，28(4)：215-224.
［10］Nerz C，Schwickert L，Becker C，et al.Effectiveness of robot-assisted training added to conventional rehabilitation in patients with humeral fracture early after surgical treatment：protocol of a randomised，controlled，multicentre trial［J］.Trials，2017，18(1)：589.
［11］Shields E，Iannuzzi JC，Thorsness R，et al.Postoperative morbidity by procedure and patient factors influencing major complications within 30 days following shoulder surgery［J］.Orthop J Sports Med，2014，2(10)：2325967114553164.
［12］戴闽，于小龙.骨折治疗的思考-AO、BO的演变及CO时代的到来［J］.中国骨与关节损伤杂志，2016，31(4)：447-448.
［13］Costantino C，Verdano MA，Jacopetti M，et al.Isokinetic strength test and functional outcomes in proximal humeral fractures treated with a locking plate［J］.J Orthop Sci，2014，19(5)：776-785.
［14］Dandinoglu T，Akarsu S，Karadeniz M，et al.Can long-term bisphosphonate use causes low-energy fractures? A case report［J］.Osteoporos Int，2014，25(2)：773-776.
［15］Verdano MA，Baudi P，Pellegrini A，et al.Strength recovery after proximal humeral fractures treated with locking plate［J］.Musculoskelet Surg，2014，98(Suppl 1)：61-69.
［16］Van De Water AT，Shields N，Davidson M，et al.Reliability and validity of shoulder function outcome measures in people with a proximal humeral fracture［J］.Disabil Rehabil，2014，36(13)：1072-1079.
［17］Shi ZK，Jiang YB，Ji XD，et al.Case-control study on locking titanium plate in treating comminuted proximal humeral fracture in elderly［J］.Zhongguo Gushang，2014，27(12)：986-990.
［18］武京伟，沈惠良，刘利民，等.PHILOS钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折早期内固定失效原因［J］.北京大学学报(医学版)，2016，48(4)：683-685.
［19］Qin B，Li P，Yang J，et al.Effectiveness of proximal humeral internal locking system plate for proximal humerus fractures［J］.Zhongguo Xiufu Chongjian Waike Zazhi，2016，30(10)：1195-1199.
晋公网安备 14010702070875号