Abstract:Objective To evaluate effect of dexmedetomidine for motor evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine surgery.Methods 90 patients undergoing single segment anterior cervical decompression were randomly assigned to a high-dose group,a low-dose group and a control group.The high-dose group was given a dosage of 1 μg /kg dexmede to midineat 10 minutes before the induction,while the low-dose group was given 0.5μg/kg dexmedetomidine and the control group received only the same dosage of saline injection.The amplitude and latency of motor evoked potential(MEP) was measured in three groups after drug administration,and the difference in amplitude and latency between the three groups was compared.At the same time,the effective extraction rate of MEP after cervical decompression was recorded and compared between the three group.Results The high dosage of dexmedetomidine significantly decreased the amplitude of MEP and prolonged the latency,with statistically significance when compared with the control group.By contrast,the low dosage of dexmedetomidine had little influence on the amplitude and latency of MEP when compared with the control group.After the decompression of the cervical spine,the high dosage of dexmedetomidine resulted in the decrease of the effective extraction rate of ME while the low dose had little effect on the effective extraction rate of MEP.Conclusion Different dosage of dexmedetomidine will affect the MEP monitoring during spinal surgery.The high dosage causes the decreased of amplitude,the prolonged of latency and the decreased of effective extraction rate.Therefore,the dosage of dexmedetomidine should be maintained at 0.5~1.0 g/kg during anesthesia induction,which will avoid the falsenegative result of MEP and improve the accuracy of monitoring during surgery.
严彬,黄晓虹,吴元珏,王晓宁 *. 右美托咪定对颈椎前路手术运动诱发电位监测的影响[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2018, 24(3): 223-225.
Yan Bin,Huang Xiaohong,Wu Yuanjue,et al. Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Monitoring of Motor Evoked Potential in Anterior Cervical Surgery. sygkzz, 2018, 24(3): 223-225.
[1]Gavaret M,Jouve JL,Péréon Y,et al.Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring in spine surgery.Developments and state of the art in France in 2011[J].OrthopTraumatolSurg Res,2013,99(6 Suppl):S319-327.
[2]Weinzierl MR,Reinacher P,Gilsbach JM,et al.Combined motor and somatosensory evoked potentials for intraoperative monitoring:intra-and postoperative data in a series of 69 operations[J].Neurosurg Rev,2007,30(2):109-116.
[3]张玉龙,角述兰.运动诱发电位与麻醉的研究进展[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2013,(7):718-720.
[4]Weerink MA,Struys MM,Hannivoort LN,et al.Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Dexmedetomidine[J].Clin Pharmacokinet,2017,56(8):893-913.
[5]Thirumala PD,Muralidharan A,Loke YK,et al.Value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring to reduce neurological complications in patients undergoing anterior cervical spine procedures for cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].J Clin Neurosci,2016(25):27-35.
[6]Mahmoud M,Sadhasivam S,Salisbury S,et al.Susceptibility of transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials to varying targeted blood levels of dexmedetomidine during spine surgery[J].Anesthesiology,2010,112(6):1364-1373.
[7]Koruk S,Mizrak A,Kaya UB,et al.Propofol/dexmedetomidine and propofol/ketamine combinations for anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing transcatheter atrial septal defect closure:a prospective randomized study[J].Clin Ther,2010,32(4):701-709.