Objective To explore the effectiveness,safety,and intraoperative precautions of 3D printed cortical bone trajectory(CBT) guiding template in lumbar CBT fixation surgery.Methods The clinical data of 74 patients with osteoporotic lumbar degenerative diseases treated in Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2019 to December 2020 were collected.There were 43 males and 31 females.The age ranged from 68 to 74 years,with an average age of (69.82±5.73)years.There were 39 patients in the guided template CBT group,including 17 males and 22 females.The average age was (70.24±3.83)years (range 68 to 73 years).There were 35 patients in the manual CBT group,including 14 males and 21 females,aged 68 to 74 years,with an average age of (69.51±3.52)years.Gender,age,disease diagnosis,operation duration,blood loss (intraoperative and postoperative blood loss),intraoperative fluoroscopy times and screw location imaging evaluation were collected.The Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the functional recovery of the patients preoperative,postoperative,and at followup at the end of one year.Postoperative complications such as wound infection,fusion device displacement,screw extraction and fixation rupture were compared between guided template CBT implantation and manual screw implantation.Results All patients were followed up for 12 to 30 months,with a mean of (20.92±8.57)months.There was a statistically significant difference in operation time between the guided template group and the freehand screw group (t=-23.20,P=0.03).The blood loss in guided template CBT group (80.00±12.65)mL was significantly lower than that (230.00±38.70)mL in manual CBT group (t=-36.62,P=0.03).The number of radiation-oriented CBT sessions during surgery was significantly lower than that in the hands-free group (3 VS 12 sessions,t=-5.65,P<0.01).There were no significant differences in the incidence of wound infection and internal fixation failure between the guided template group and the free hand group (t=0.94,P=1.00).At the last followup,there was no significant difference in VAS score and ODI score between the two groups (t=-1.05,-0.79,P=0.28,P=0.36).Conclusion Guided template CBT implantation technique can shorten the operation time,reduce blood loss,and reduce radiation damage to patients and medical staff,so it is a more economical,efficient and effective CBT implantation technique.
[1]唐少龙黄庆华吴罗根刘超李丰欧阳骁杰.腰椎椎间孔外椎体间融合结合椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗退变性腰椎滑脱[J].临床骨科杂志,2021,24(1):11-14.
[2]Santoni BG,Hynes RA,McGilvray KG,et al.Cortical bone Trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws[J].Spine J,2009,9(5):366-373.
[3]陈豪杰,刘世长,张嘉男,等.徒手与机器人辅助皮质骨轨迹螺钉固定治疗合并骨质疏松症的腰椎退行性疾病对比研究[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2020,34(9):1142-1148.
[4]Kerolus MG,Ketan Y,Witiw CD,et al.Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for singlelevel minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion decreases length of stay and opioid consumption[J].Neurosurgery,2021,88(3):648-657.
[5]Okuda S,Oda T,Miyauchi A,et al.Surgical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients[J].J Bone Joint Surg(Am),2007,88(12):310-320.
[6]赵桐.椎弓根螺钉联合PLIF治疗中老年腰椎滑脱症的临床疗效分析[D].兰州大学,2013.
[7]Bohl MA,Hlubek RJ,Kakarla UK,et al.Divergent bilateral posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cortical screw fixation:Description of new trajectory for interbody technique from midline exposure[J].World Neurosurg,2018(113):e480-485.
[8]李越,刘玉增,潘爱星,等.皮质骨轨迹螺钉技术在脊柱外科的应用[J].中华医学杂志,2021,101(45):3762-3766.
[9]张希诺,海涌,关立,等.后路中线腰椎椎间融合术与后路腰椎间融合治疗轻度退行性腰椎滑脱临床对比研究[J].中国骨与关节杂志,2023,12(1):12-21.
[10]Arzoglou V,Vial I,Hussain M,et al.Lumbar fixation using the cortical bone trajectory fixation:A single surgeon’s experience with 3year followup[J].Oper Neurosurg,2022,22(3):87-100.
[11]Pei B,Xu Y,Zhao Y,et al.Biomechanical comparative analysis of conventional pedicle screws and cortical bone trajectory fixation in the lumbar spine:An in vitro and finite element study[J].Front Bioeng Biotechnol,2023(11):1060059.
[12]Tasinkevych Y,Falińska K,Lewin PA,et al.Improving broadband ultrasound attenuation assessment in cancellous bone by mitigating the influence of cortical bone:Phantom and invitro study[J].Ultrasonics,2019(94):382-390.
[13]袁林,贾育松,李亚锋,等.皮质骨轨迹椎弓根螺钉在腰椎后路融合术后邻椎病中的应用[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2023,31(4):25-35.
[14]邵明昊,吕飞舟,马晓生,等.腰椎皮质骨钉道螺钉在骨质疏松症患者中应用的三维有限元分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,1(2):1-6.
[15]Chung TT,Chu CL,Hueng DY,et al.A parametric investigation on traditional and cortical bone trajectory screws for transpedicular fixation[J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2022,23(1):612.
[16]Zhang L,Li HM,Zhang R,et al.Biomechanical changes of adjacent and fixed segments through cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus traditional trajectory screw fixation in the lumbar spine:A finite element analysis[J].World Neurosurg,2021(151):e447-e456.
[17]Matsukawa K,Yato Y,Kato T,et al.In vivo analysis of insertional torque during pedicle screwing using cortical bone trajectory technique[J].Spine,2014,39(4):E240-245.
[18]Ueno M,Imura T,Inoue G,et al.Posterior corrective fusion using a double trajectory technique for degenerative lumbar scoliosis with osteoporosis:Technical note[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2013,19(5):600-607.
[19]Hu JN,Yang XF,Li CM,et al.Comparison of cortical bone trajectory versus pedicle screw techniques in lumbar fusion surgery:A meta-analysis[J].Medicine (Baltimore),2019,98(33):e16751.
[20]Qiu L,Niu F,Wu Z,et al.Comparative outcomes of cortical bone trajectory screw fixation and traditional pedicle screws in lumbar fusion:A meta-analysis[J].World Neurosurg,2022(164):e436-e445.
[21]徐彬.三维导航技术辅助腰椎椎弓根螺钉置入及术后螺钉松动危险因素的临床分析[D].湖北中医药大学,2018.
[22]Matsukawa K,Kaito T,Abe Y.Comparison of safety and perioperative outcomes between patientspecific template-guided and fluoroscopic-assisted freehand lumbar screw placement using cortical bone trajectory technique[J].Global Spine J,2022(30):21925682221143333.
[23]Petrone S,Marengo N,Ajello M,et al.Cortical bone trajectory technique’s outcomes and procedures for posterior lumbar fusion:A retrospective study[J].J Clin Neurosci,2020(76):25-30.