机器人辅助单体位和双体位斜外侧腰椎椎间融合内固定术疗效比较

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (2)

全文: PDF (4142 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的本文旨在研究机器人辅助斜外侧腰椎椎间融合(oblique lateral interbody fusion，OLIF)内固定术在单体位和双体位手术中的临床效果。方法回顾性收集2018年7月至2021年9月接受同一外科医生单体位机器人辅助OLIF手术的12例患者，其中男性4例，女性8例；平均年龄(59.17±8.72)岁。根据年龄、性别、身体质量指数(body mass index，BMI)和手术节段按1︰2比例匹配双体位机器人辅助OLIF组患者24例，其中男性8例，女性16例；平均年龄(59.50±7.76)岁。收集患者BMI、手术节段、手术时间、术中失血量、透视次数、术后住院时间和非计划二次手术资料。统计分析上位椎间盘高度、腰椎前凸角、手术节段椎间孔高度、小关节侵犯、螺钉偏离距离和螺钉安全等级等影像学参数并计算螺钉可接受率的变化。结果两组手术时间、失血量、术后住院时间、上段椎间盘高度、腰椎前凸角和椎间孔高度比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。单体位组的辐照次数低于双体位组(P＝0.038)。术后两组手术节段椎间孔高度较术前均增加(P＜0.01)。单体位组螺钉可接受率为98%，双体位组为97%。结论机器人辅助OLIF单体位手术与双体位手术具有同等的安全性和准确性，单体位手术可以减少手术辐照次数，提高椎间孔高度，但无法减少手术时间和失血量。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	房彦名
	袁强
	韩晓光
	何达
	田伟

关键词 ：机器人辅助手术, 单体位手术, 斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术, 螺钉置入

Abstract：Objective To study clinical effect of robot-assisted oblique lateral interbody fusion (RAOLIF) and internal fixation in single position or reposition surgery.
Methods Twelve patients underwent single position RAOLIF surgery operated by the same surgeon from July 2018 to September 2021 were retrospectively collected.The patients included four males and eight females aging (59.17±8.72) years.Twenty-four patients with matched age，gender，body mass index (BMI) and surgical segment were included in robot-reposition RAOLIF group.The patients were (59.50±7.76) years old.There were eight males and sixteen females.BMI，operation segments，operative time，intraoperative blood loss，times of radiations，length of postoperative hospital stay and unplanned secondary surgery were collected.Radiology parameters as disc height of upper segment，lumbar lordosis angle，foraminal height of surgical segment，facet joint invasions，screw deviation distance and screw breach grade were measured and analyzed.Screw acceptable rate was calculated.Results There was no difference between two groups in operation time，blood loss，postoperative hospital stay，disc height of upper segment，lumbar lordosis angle，and intervertebral foramen height (P＞0.05).Number of radiation times in single position group was lower than reposition group (P＝0.038).After surgery，foraminal height of surgical segment was increased in both groups (P＜0.01).Screw accessibility rate was 98% in single group and 97% in reposition group.
Conclusion RAOLIF surgery in single position has the same safety and accuracy as reposition surgery.It could reduce the surgical radiation and improve foraminal height，though could not decrease the operation time and blood loss.

Key words： robot-assisted surgery single-position surgery oblique lateral interbody fusion pedicle screw insertion

基金资助:北京市医院管理中心创新梦工场项目(202109)
国家自然科学基金项目(U1713221)

通讯作者: 田伟

作者简介: 房彦名(1997－ )，男，研究生在读，北京大学第四临床医学院，ymfang@bjmu.edu.cn

引用本文:

房彦名，袁强，韩晓光，何达，田伟. 机器人辅助单体位和双体位斜外侧腰椎椎间融合内固定术疗效比较[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2023, 29(01): 1-.
Fang Yanming，Yuan Qiang，Han Xiaoguang，He Da，Tian Wei. Comparison of Robot Assisted Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion and Internal Fixation in Single Position and Reposition Surgery. sygkzz, 2023, 29(01): 1-.

链接本文:

http://www.sygkzz.com/CN/ 或 http://www.sygkzz.com/CN/Y2023/V29/I01/1

［1］Briggs HH，Milligan PR.Chip Fusion of the low back following exploration of the spinal cana［J］.J Bone Joint Surg(Am)，1944，26(7)：125-130.
［2］Cloward RB.The treatment of ruptured lumbar intervertebral discs by vertebral body fusion.I.Indications，operative technique，after care［J］.J Neurosurg，1953，10(2)：154-168.
［3］Silvestre C，Mac-Thiong JM，Hilmi R，et al.Complications and morbidities of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion：Oblique lumbar interbody fusion in 179 patients［J］.Asian Spine J，2012，6(2)：89-97.
［4］Eck JC，Hodges S，Humphreys SC.Minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion［J］.J Am Acad Orthop Surg，2007，15(6)：321-329.
［5］Mayer MH.A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion［J］.Spine，1997，22(6)：691-699.
［6］Oliveira L，Marchi L，Coutinho E，et al.A radiographic assessment of the ability of the extreme lateral interbody fusion procedure to indirectly decompress the neural elements［J］.Spine (Phila Pa 1976)，2010，35(26 Suppl)：S331-337.
［7］Blizzard DJ，Thomas JA.MIS single-position lateral and oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion and bilateral pedicle screw fixation：Feasibility and perioperative results［J］.Spine (Phila Pa 1976)，2018，43(6)：440-446.
［8］Tanaka M.Simultaneous oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and lateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (Lateral PPS)：A Technical Note［J］.Res Arthritis Bone Study，2019(1)：1-8.
［9］Ouchida J，Kanemura T，Satake K，et al.Simultaneous single-position lateral interbody fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation using O-arm-based navigation reduces the occupancy time of the operating room［J］.Eur Spine J，2020，29(6)：1277-1286.
［10］Hiyama A，Katoh H，Nomura S，et al.Intraoperative computed tomography-guided navigation versus fluoroscopy for single-position surgery after lateral lumbar interbody fusion［J］.J Clin Neurosci，2021(93)：75-81.
［11］Huntsman KT，Riggleman JR，Ahrendtsen LA，et al.Navigated robot-guided pedicle screws placed successfully in single-position lateral lumbar interbody fusion［J］.J Robot Surg，2020，14(4)：643-647.
［12］Pham MH，Diaz-Aguilar LD，Shah V，et al.Simultaneous robotic single position oblique lumbar interbody fusion with bilateral sacropelvic fixation in lateral decubitus［J］.Neurospine，2021，18(2)：406-412.
［13］Pham MH，Gupta M，Stone LE，et al.Minimally invasive L₅S₁ oblique lumbar interbody fusion with simultaneous robotic single position posterior fixation：2-dimensional operative video［J］.Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)，2021，21(6)：E543.
［14］Diaz-Aguilar LD，Shah V，Himstead A，et al.Simultaneous robotic single-position surgery (SR-SPS) with oblique lumbar interbody fusion：A case series［J］.World Neurosurg，2021(151)：e1036-e1043.
［15］Park JW，Nam HS，Cho SK，et al.Kambin's triangle approach of lumbar transforaminal epidural injection with spinal stenosis［J］.Ann Rehabil Med，2011，35(6)：833-843.
［16］Gertzbein SD，Robbins SE.Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo［J］.Spine (Phila Pa 1976)，1990，15(1)：11-14.
［17］Tanaka M，Blattert T.C-arm free oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and lateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (Lateral PPS)：Technical note［J］，Res Arthritis Bone Study，2018(3)：1-9.
［18］Cheng C，Wang K，Zhang C，et al.Clinical results and complications associated with oblique lumbar interbody fusion technique［J］.Ann Transl Med，2021，9(1)：16.
［19］Cho MS，Seo EM.Efficacy and radiographic analysis of oblique lumbar interbody fusion in treating lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with sagittal imbalance［J］.Neurosurg Rev，2021，44(4)：2181-2189.
［20］Zhao L，Xie T，Wang X，et al.Comparing the medium-term outcomes of lumbar interbody fusion via transforaminal and oblique approach in treating lumbar degenerative disc diseases［J］.Spine J，2022，22(6)：993-1001.