摘要目的 本研究目的在于评估Ortho One PROMT评分在预测半月板撕裂可修复性方面的准确性,检验其是否具备解决术前半月板手术方式预测困难的能力。方法 纳入本院2019年3月至2019年12月因半月板损伤而接受关节镜下手术者55膝58侧半月板。本研究分为两个部分。第一部分:评分过程由两位医生按Ortho One PROMT评分细则分别对半月板损伤者进行独立评分,并根据得分预测半月板手术术式。第二部分:将两位评分医生预测的半月板手术术式分别与手术医生的实际手术术式进行一致性比较,最终评价Ortho One PROMT评分在预测半月板撕裂可修复性方面的准确性、敏感度及特异度。结果 评分医生预测半月板修复的平均正确率为86.9%,平均敏感度为86.9%,平均特异度为87.5%,平均阳性预测值92.9%,平均阴性预测值为77.9%;预测半月板切除的平均正确率为87.5%,平均敏感度为87.5%,平均特异度为86.9%,平均阳性预测值为77.9%,平均阴性预测值为92.9%。两位评分医生的预测结果与手术医生的实际术式高度一致(k=0.78,k=0.67)。结论 Ortho One PROMT评分预测半月板撕裂可修复性不仅简便、可操作性强,而且具有良好的准确性、敏感度和特异度,能够有效解决当前术前半月板手术方式预测困难的问题,具有一定的临床应用推广价值。
Abstract:Objective At present,it is still difficult to accurately predict the surgical method of meniscus injury before surgery.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the Ortho One PROMT score in predicting the repairability of meniscus tears,and to test whether it has the solution to the difficulty of predicting meniscus surgery before surgery.Methods 58 meniscuin 55 kneesunderwent arthroscopic surgery for meniscus injury from March 2019 to December 2019 were included in our hospital.This study was divided into two parts.Inthe part I,scoring process was performed by two grading doctors,who scored the meniscus injury independently according to the Ortho One PROMT scoring rules,and predicted the operation of meniscus surgery based on the score.Inthe part II,we compared the meniscus surgical procedures predicted by the two scoring doctors with the actual surgical procedures of the surgeons,and finally evaluate the accuracy,sensitivity and specificity of the Ortho One PROMT score in predicting the repairability of meniscus tears.Results The scoring doctor predicted that the average correct rate of meniscus repair was 86.9%,the average sensitivity was 86.9%,and the average specificity was 87.5%.The average correct rate of the predicted meniscectomy was 87.5%,the average sensitivity was 87.5%,and the average specificity was 86.9%.The prediction results of the two scoring doctors were highly consistent with the actual operation methods of the surgeon (k=0.78,k=0.67).Conclusion The Ortho One PROMT score predicts meniscus tear repairability is not only simple and easy to operate,but also has good accuracy,sensitivity and specificity.It can effectively solve the problem of difficulty in predicting the meniscus surgery,and has the value of clinical application.
肖琼润,杨国夫 *,孙浩源. Ortho One PROMT评分预测半月板撕裂可修复性的作用[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2020, 26(7): 587-604.
Xiao Qiongrun,Yang Guofu *,Sun Haoyuan. The Role of Ortho One PROMT Score in Predicting the Repairability of Meniscus Tear. sygkzz, 2020, 26(7): 587-604.
[1]Paxton ES,Stock MV,Brophy RH.Meniscal repair versus partial meniscectomy:a systematic review comparing reoperation rates and clinical outcomes[J].Arthroscopy,2011,27(9):1275-1288.
[2]Stein T,Mehling AP,Welsch F,et al.Long-term outcome after arthroscopic meniscal repair versus arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for traumatic meniscal tears[J].Am J Sports Med,2010,38(8):1542-1548.
[3]Blake MH,Lattermann C,Johnson DL.MRI and arthroscopic evaluation of meniscal injuries[J].Sports Med Arthrosc Rev,2017,25(4):219-226.
[4]Shiozaki Y,Horibe S,Mitsuoka T,et al.Prediction of reparability of isolated semilunar lateral meniscus tears by magnetic resonance imaging[J].Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2002,10(4):213-217.
[5]Thoreux P,Frédérique R,Nourissat G,et al.Bucket-Handle Meniscal Lesions:Magnetic Resonance Imaging Criteria for Reparability[J].Arthroscopy,2006,22(9):954-961.
[6]Bernthal NM,Seeger LL,Motamedi K,et al.Can the reparability of meniscal tears be predicted with magnetic resonance imaging?[J].Am JSports Med,2011,39(3):506-510.
[7]Van der Wal RJ,Ottevanger JW,de Rooij TP,et al.Intraobserver and interobserveragreement of magnetic resonance imaging for reparability of peripheral meniscal tears:What criteria really matter?[J].J Knee Surg,2017,30(3):276-282.
[8]Felisaz PF,Alessandrino F,Perelli S,et al.Role of MRI in predicting meniscal tear reparability[J].Skeletal Radiol,2017,46(10):1343-1351.
[9]Matava MJ,Eck K,Totty W,et al.Magnetic resonance imaging as a tool to predict meniscal reparability[J].Am J Sports Med,1999,27(4):436-443.
[10]Misir A,Kizkapan TB,YildizKI,et al.Using only MRI is moderately reliable in the prediction of meniscal tear reparability[J].Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2019,27(3):898-904.
[11]Kumaraswamy V,Ramaswamy AG,Sundar S,et al.A new scoring system for prediction of meniscal repair in traumatic meniscal tears[J].Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2019,27(11):3454-3460.
[12]Cohen J.A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales[J].Educational & Psychological Measurement,1960,20(1):37-46.
[13]Landis JR,Koch GG.The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data[J].Biometrics,1977,33(1):159-174.
[14]Philippe B,Roland B,Sebastian K,et al.The knee meniscus:management of traumatic tears and degenerative lesions[J].EFORT Open Rev,2017,2(5):195-203.
[15]Hennerbichler A,Moutos FT,Hennerbichler D,et al.Repair response of the inner and outer regions of the porcine meniscus in vitro[J].Am J Sports Med,2007,35(5):754-762.
[16]李箭,蒋欣,裴福兴,等.膝关节半月板修复中血液供给的解剖学特征[J].中国临床康复,2005,26(9):254-256.
[17]Getgood A,Brooks R,Fortier L,et al.Articular cartilage tissue engineering:today's research,tomorrow's practice?[J].J Bone Joint Surg(Br),2009,91(5):565-576.
[18]Magee T.Three-tesla MR imaging of the knee[J].Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am,2007,15(1):125-132.
[19]Magee T,Williams D.3.0-T MRI of meniscal tears[J].Am J Roentgenol,2006,187(2):371-375.
[20]Nemec SF,Marlovits S,Trattnig S,et al.High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging and conventional magnetic resonance imaging on a standard field-strength magnetic resonance system compared to arthroscopy in patients with suspected meniscal tears[J].Acad Radiol,2008,15(7):928-933.